Skip to main content

Security report for cloudimg.io

Scaleflex · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cloudimage, operated by Scaleflex, is a SaaS provider specializing in image CDN and dynamic media optimization services. The company targets developers, product teams, marketers, and e-commerce businesses, offering solutions that improve SEO, page load times, and user experience through advanced image resizing, compression, and delivery technologies. Their platform integrates with multiple global CDN partners to ensure fast and reliable image delivery worldwide. The website demonstrates a strong market position with over 1000 companies served and showcases customer logos and case studies to reinforce credibility. Technically, the website is built on Webflow and leverages modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Weglot for translations, and CookiePro for consent management. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, with comprehensive metadata and structured content. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS enforcement and URL signing features, although explicit security headers could be improved. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, incident response and security policy disclosures are not found, representing an area for enhancement. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for technology SaaS companies, and does not detract from the overall legitimacy. Overall, Cloudimage presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically mature web presence with strong business credibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing security and incident response policies, and maintaining transparency in privacy and compliance practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cloudimg.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudimg.io

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cloudimage operates in the technology sector, focusing on image CDN and media optimization services for digital businesses. Their competitive advantage lies in dynamic image transformation, multi-CDN delivery, and ease of integration with popular CMS and development platforms. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with tiered pricing plans catering to personal, startup, and professional users. Revenue streams include monthly and annual subscriptions with overuse fees. The target customer segments include developers, marketers, e-commerce platforms, and agencies. Growth indicators include a broad customer base, partnerships with major CDN providers, and active marketing through case studies and documentation. The partnership ecosystem includes Scaleflex as the parent company and integrations with global CDNs and analytics providers. The company maintains a strong brand presence and consistent messaging across its digital assets.

Security posture

Cloudimage demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and use of signed URLs and domain whitelisting to protect image delivery tokens. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms indicates attention to privacy compliance. No security headers beyond HTTPS are explicitly detected, suggesting room for improvement in Content-Security-Policy and other headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts is a gap in transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good, with recommendations to enhance header implementation and publish formal security documentation to improve trust and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS risks.
  2. Add security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan with contact information.
  4. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing direct contact emails or forms for security and abuse reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scaleflex
Description
Cloudimage converts to the best format, optimizes the size quality ratio and delivers your web images to your customers through our rocket fast image CDN network worldwide.
Key services
Image resizing, Image compression, Responsive images, Watermarking, Background removal, Multi-CDN delivery
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Weglot (translation), Trustpilot widget, CookiePro (OneTrust) consent, Cloudimage Responsive plugin
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of signed URLs and domain whitelisting mentioned for protection
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Trustpilot, CookiePro (OneTrust)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is rich, professional, and targeted at developers and marketers
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and compliance tools
  4. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected
  5. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, common for tech SaaS companies
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies including jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. It integrates Weglot for multilingual support and CookiePro for cookie consent management, indicating a mature approach to internationalization and privacy compliance. The site loads quickly with optimized images and responsive design, supporting excellent mobile usability and SEO. Hosting appears to be managed via Identity Digital or related providers. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with opportunities to improve security headers and formalize security documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with scalable and performant delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100 +4Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 64/100 +9Medium35 findingsView report
  3. 55/100Medium37 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudimg.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudimg.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.