Skip to main content

Security report for cloudimg.io

Scaleflex · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cloudimage, operated by Scaleflex, is a specialized SaaS provider offering an image CDN service that optimizes web images for faster load times, improved SEO, and better user experience. The company targets developers, product teams, marketers, and e-commerce businesses, providing scalable solutions with tiered pricing plans and SLA-backed services. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with multi-language support, customer testimonials, and detailed product features. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and Trustpilot for analytics and reputation management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces domain trust but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional business presentation. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies, enhancing WHOIS transparency, and adding security headers to further harden the site.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cloudimg.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudimg.io

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cloudimage operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, providing image optimization and CDN services that cater to a broad range of clients including large enterprises and startups. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with multiple pricing tiers from free personal plans to enterprise solutions. The company leverages partnerships with major CDN providers and integrates with popular CMS platforms. Its competitive advantage lies in ease of integration, performance improvements, and cost savings on bandwidth and infrastructure. The presence of case studies and notable clients indicates a strong market position and growing customer base. Scaleflex, the parent company, supports Cloudimage with additional digital asset management products, creating a comprehensive media optimization ecosystem.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The use of signed URLs and domain whitelisting for token protection is a positive security practice. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Provide explicit contact channels for security incidents and abuse reporting.
  3. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Improve WHOIS data transparency or provide verified domain registration information to enhance legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scaleflex
Description
Cloudimage provides an image CDN service that resizes, compresses, and accelerates web images to improve SEO, load times, and conversions. It leverages modern image formats and multi-CDN delivery to optimize image delivery worldwide.
Key services
Image resizing, Image compression, Responsive images, Watermarking, Background removal, Multi-CDN delivery
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Weglot translation, Trustpilot widget, CookiePro consent, Cloudimage Responsive JS plugin
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of signed URLs and domain whitelisting mentioned for protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Weglot translation, Trustpilot reviews
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong focus on image CDN optimization for SEO and performance
  3. Multiple language support via Weglot
  4. Clear pricing plans with detailed features and SLA commitments
  5. Presence of customer testimonials and case studies
  6. Use of modern web technologies and best practices
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Weglot for multilingual support. It uses a responsive design with mobile optimization and fast loading times. The integration of third-party services such as Trustpilot and CookiePro enhances user trust and compliance. The technical implementation is robust with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. The use of multi-CDN delivery partners like Amazon, Fastly, Akamai, and CDNetwork indicates a scalable and performant infrastructure. There is no indication of technical debt or legacy technology, and the site appears well-maintained and modern.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100 −2Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 70/100 +15Medium32 findingsView report
  3. 55/100Medium37 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudimg.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudimg.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.