Skip to main content

Security report for buycheapestfollowers.com

BuyCheapestFollowers.com · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BuyCheapestFollowers.com is an e-commerce platform specializing in selling social media engagement services such as followers, likes, views, and other interactions across multiple social media platforms including Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube, Telegram, and Twitter (X). The website positions itself as a low-cost provider with instant delivery and a broad service offering targeting social media users, influencers, and marketers seeking to boost their online presence. The business has been operational since 2014, supported by a domain registration consistent with this timeline. Technically, the website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Hotjar for analytics and user interaction tracking. Hosting and DNS services are provided by GoDaddy and Cloudflare respectively, ensuring a stable infrastructure with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. The website implements basic privacy and cookie policies with a consent mechanism, but lacks explicit security policies or incident response information. Contact information is limited to a web form with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly available. Overall, the website demonstrates a moderate security posture with room for improvement in security headers and transparency. The content is professionally presented with good navigation and mobile optimization, but the absence of direct contact details and security policies slightly impacts trustworthiness. The site is safe for general audiences, focusing solely on social media marketing services without any adult or explicit content.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of buycheapestfollowers.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching buycheapestfollowers.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the competitive social media marketing services sector, focusing on providing affordable and rapid delivery of social media engagement metrics. Its business model relies on e-commerce sales of various packages tailored to different social media platforms and user needs, including targeted followers and likes by demographics or geography. The platform supports multiple languages, indicating an international target market. The presence of a money-back guarantee and testimonials suggests efforts to build customer trust and credibility. The company leverages third-party tools for analytics and customer interaction but does not publicly disclose detailed business or legal information, which is common in this niche. The lack of direct contact details may limit customer confidence but is balanced by the site's longevity and domain stability. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the available data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited status, which are positive indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. The site uses multiple third-party scripts including analytics and live chat, which require regular security audits to prevent vulnerabilities. No advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which reduces transparency and preparedness perception. Forms appear to be standard with no password fields requested, reducing risk of credential exposure. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced domain security, security headers, and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Provide verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve customer trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and reduce attack surface.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BuyCheapestFollowers.com
Description
Buy Cheap Followers and Likes at the best rates globally. We offer 40+ different Instagram services. Plus services for, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and many more
Key services
Instagram followers, Instagram likes, TikTok followers, Facebook likes, YouTube views, Telegram likes, Twitter (X) likes and views, Other social media engagement services
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.1, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No passwords requested on site
  • Client transfer and update prohibitions on domain

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Tawk.to live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers a wide range of social media engagement services including followers, likes, views across multiple platforms.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and multiple language support.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing tools.
  6. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery 2.1.1 and Bootstrap 3.3.7, which are somewhat dated but still widely supported. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Hotjar for tracking and analytics, indicating a focus on user behavior analysis and marketing optimization. Hosting is managed via GoDaddy with DNS through Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure and CDN benefits. The site is mobile optimized and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with some use of asynchronous and deferred script loading. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium22 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with buycheapestfollowers.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review buycheapestfollowers.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.