Skip to main content

Is bridges.insure a Scam? Security Check Results - Bridges Insurance Brokers Ltd

bridges.insure Security Report Summary

bridges.insure received a security score of 47 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". This report covers Bridges Insurance Brokers Ltd's website security posture. Bridges Insurance Brokers Ltd operates in the Other industry in United Kingdom.

Bridges Insurance Brokers Ltd is a well-established independent insurance brokerage firm based in the United Kingdom, with over 54 years of experience serving commercial, property, high-net-worth, charity, and community sectors. The company offers tailored insurance solutions and prides itself on personalized service and specialist knowledge, particularly in niche markets such as church and charity insurance. Their market position is supported by strong trust indicators including FCA registration, client testimonials, and partnerships with major insurers. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, and cookie consent mechanisms, ensuring a user-friendly and compliant digital presence. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content relevance, although some security headers are missing which could be improved. The website is fully accessible without any WAF or blocking mechanisms, indicating stable hosting and infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and GDPR adherence. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, but the business legitimacy is supported by consistent contact information and FCA registration. Overall, Bridges Insurance demonstrates a solid business and digital presence with good security hygiene and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency would further enhance their security posture and trustworthiness.

The security scan identified 33 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, CookieConsent.js, Wallop.js (slider), Font Awesome.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and business-context intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

bridges.insure favicon

Is bridges.insure Safe? Security Analysis for Bridges Insurance Brokers Ltd

https://www.bridges.insure/

Check if bridges.insure is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Kingdomsmall
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook SDKCookieConsent.jsWallop.js (slider)+1 more
Analyzed Completed
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

GDPR-aligned

Data handling

EU

Hosting region

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional Report

Unlock the full report for bridges.insure

Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

AI Summary

Bridges Insurance Brokers Ltd is a well-established independent insurance brokerage firm based in the United Kingdom, with over 54 years of experience serving commercial, property, high-net-worth, charity, and community sectors. The company offers tailored insurance solutions and prides itself on personalized service and specialist knowledge, particularly in niche markets such as church and charity insurance. Their market position is supported by strong trust indicators including FCA registration, client testimonials, and partnerships with major insurers. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, and cookie consent mechanisms, ensuring a user-friendly and compliant digital presence. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content relevance, although some security headers are missing which could be improved. The website is fully accessible without any WAF or blocking mechanisms, indicating stable hosting and infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and GDPR adherence. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, but the business legitimacy is supported by consistent contact information and FCA registration. Overall, Bridges Insurance demonstrates a solid business and digital presence with good security hygiene and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency would further enhance their security posture and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook SDKCookieConsent.jsWallop.js (slider)Font Awesome

10 urgent findings need attention

1 critical · 9 high

  • + 2 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep bridges.insure under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for bridges.insure.

OffSeq Observations

No critical findings yet

81/100

SSL/TLS Security

6 findings

47/100

DNS Health

3 findings

75/100

Network Security

2 findings

0/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bridges Insurance operates in the insurance brokerage sector, targeting small to medium businesses, property owners, high-net-worth individuals, and non-profit organizations in the UK. Their competitive advantage lies in specialist insurance products and personalized service, supported by a long-standing market presence since 1972. Revenue streams likely include commissions from insurance policies and advisory services. The company maintains partnerships with major insurers and affiliate programs to extend their offerings. Growth indicators include a modern website with active content such as blogs and testimonials, and a clear focus on niche markets like charity and church insurance. The company’s strategic ecosystem includes digital marketing tools and affiliate partnerships to enhance lead generation and customer engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Bridges Insurance Brokers Ltd

Registration Number:

302411

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No forms or input fields were detected on the homepage, reducing attack surface. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party scripts (Google Analytics, Facebook SDK) is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and publishing clear security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Bridges Insurance Brokers Ltd

Description:

Bridges Insurance is an independent insurance broker with over 54 years of experience, specializing in commercial, property, high-net-worth, charity, and community insurance. They provide tailored insurance solutions for businesses, properties, churches, charities, and high-net-worth individuals.

Key Services:
Commercial InsuranceProperty InsuranceHigh-Net Worth InsuranceChurch InsuranceCharity & Community InsuranceCyber Insurance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook SDKCookieConsent.jsWallop.js (slider)Font Awesome
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel (implied via Facebook SDK)
Marketing Tools:
Facebook SDK
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the bridges.insure security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete bridges.insure security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:45.158.164.161 +ip4:66.155.22.59 +ip4:66.155.22.45 +ip4:159.100.136.5 +ip4:85.119.248.0/22 +ip4:212.64.144.49 +ip4:212.64.144.48 +include:spf.protection.outlook.com +include:appliedexch.co.uk include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 76 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:45.158.164.161
Name Servers:
edna.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
garrett.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: bridges-insure.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2408677467, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:33ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:45.158.164.161 +ip4:66.155.22.59 +ip4:66.155.22.45 +ip4:159.100.136.5 +ip4:85.119.248.0/22 +ip4:212.64.144.49 +ip4:212.64.144.48 +include:spf.protection.outlook.com +include:appliedexch.co.uk include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

How does bridges.insure compare?

bridges.insure scores below average. Browse similar domains to see how competitors handle security.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using standard HTML5 with integration of popular JavaScript libraries and services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and CookieConsent.js. The site uses Font Awesome for icons and Wallop.js for sliders. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers. The technical infrastructure appears stable and suitable for a small insurance brokerage, with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security hardening.
Professional Report

Download the bridges.insure report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

Want OffSeq to fix this?

Book a 30-minute remediation call

Our security engineers can resolve the high-severity findings identified in this report — from SSL misconfigurations and missing headers to compliance gaps and infrastructure hardening.

OffSeq provides end-to-end cybersecurity services: penetration testing, vulnerability remediation, compliance consulting, and continuous monitoring. View all services

Scan your own website

Liked the bridges.insure report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about bridges.insure

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website