Skip to main content

Security report for breezedoc.com

Sumo Group, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BreezeDoc is a newly founded (2024) SaaS company offering a streamlined e-signature and document signing platform targeted at freelancers, agencies, and small businesses. The platform emphasizes speed, ease of use, and affordability, positioning itself as an alternative to larger competitors like DocuSign. Key services include legally binding e-signatures, reusable templates, document tracking, invoicing, and payment integrations with Stripe and PayPal. The company is part of the Sumo Group, Inc. family and leverages partnerships with AppSumo for marketing and sales. Technically, BreezeDoc is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap 5 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The website is well-optimized for mobile devices, has good SEO practices, and loads quickly. Security is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and CSRF tokens in forms, though some security headers are not visibly configured and no explicit cookie consent mechanism is present. From a security and compliance perspective, BreezeDoc lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy policy is present but cookie consent is missing, which may impact GDPR compliance. The domain registration is consistent with the business launch timeline and uses a reputable registrar. No suspicious WHOIS or technical indicators were found. Overall, BreezeDoc presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with solid technical foundations but could improve in privacy compliance and security transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching breezedoc.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BreezeDoc operates in the competitive e-signature SaaS market, targeting small businesses and freelancers who need affordable and easy-to-use document signing solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in simplicity, speed (signing in 60 seconds), and integrated invoicing with payment gateways. Revenue streams include free and paid lifetime plans sold primarily through AppSumo, indicating a focus on digital marketplaces and direct online sales. The partnership ecosystem includes AppSumo for distribution and Stripe/PayPal for payments. Growth indicators include 20k+ business users and positive social proof from Product Hunt and AppSumo ratings. The company is relatively new but backed by Sumo Group, Inc., which may provide operational support and credibility.

Security posture

BreezeDoc demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection on forms. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. The company should consider publishing a security policy, incident response contacts, and a vulnerability disclosure program to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a SaaS startup but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance standards like GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sumo Group, Inc.
Description
BreezeDoc offers a simple, fast, and affordable e-signature and document signing platform designed for freelancers, agencies, and small businesses. It includes features like templates, tracking, invoicing, and payment integration with Stripe and PayPal.
Key services
e-signature, document signing, templates, document tracking, invoicing, payment integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Bootstrap 5, Stripe, PayPal
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and targeted at small businesses and freelancers.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected despite privacy policy presence.
  4. Multiple signup forms collect email addresses with CSRF protection.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses found on the site.
  6. Security headers are not visible in the HTML; likely configured at server level or missing.
  7. Strong branding consistency and trust signals from AppSumo and Product Hunt.
  8. Use of modern technologies and hosting on AWS.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Hosting is on Amazon AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility features. Meta tags and Open Graph data are well implemented for SEO and social sharing. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. The technical implementation is solid with minor areas for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional SaaS offering with good user experience and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100 +7Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 60/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with breezedoc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review breezedoc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.