Skip to main content

Security report for blp.digital

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website blp.digital presents itself as a provider of ERP automation solutions targeting finance, procurement, logistics, and sales sectors. It positions itself as a leading ERP automation tool with a focus on business clients seeking to streamline their enterprise resource planning processes. The site is built using modern front-end technology (Framer) and integrates multiple analytics and user behavior tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, ContentSquare, and Plausible Analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as lack of contact information, reduces transparency and compliance posture. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks security headers, which is a moderate risk. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the site is professional and business-focused but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blp.digital

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

blp.digital operates in the technology sector, specifically providing ERP automation software for business functions like finance and logistics. The business model is B2B SaaS or software solution provider. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, targeting businesses looking to automate ERP processes. The lack of company registration details, contact information, and WHOIS transparency limits full business credibility assessment. The use of advanced analytics tools suggests a focus on data-driven marketing and user experience optimization. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain or website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, which is mandatory. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other attacks. No forms or inputs were detected that collect sensitive data, reducing immediate risk. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a compliance and trust gap. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with standard security headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity and incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct audits to improve compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The new #1 ERP-Automation for finance, procurement, logistics, sales and more 🥇
Key services
ERP automation for finance, procurement automation, logistics automation, sales automation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Hotjar, ContentSquare, Plausible Analytics, Framer
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, ContentSquare, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, ContentSquare, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Hotjar, ContentSquare, Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain ownership transparency.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the site.
  5. Website uses modern analytics and tracking tools including Google Analytics, Hotjar, ContentSquare, and Plausible.
  6. Website built with Framer, indicating modern front-end technology.
  7. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Content is business-oriented ERP automation with no adult or questionable content.
  10. Overall website quality is good with professional design and clear messaging.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern web technologies and fonts from Google Fonts. It integrates multiple analytics and user behavior tracking services, including Google Analytics, Hotjar, ContentSquare, and Plausible Analytics, indicating a sophisticated approach to user data collection and marketing optimization. The site uses HTTPS with a presumably good SSL configuration. No CMS other than Framer was detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. The site does not expose forms or inputs, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction data collection points.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blp.digital. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blp.digital.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.