Skip to main content

Security report for bigtincan.com

Bigtincan · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bigtincan is an enterprise-focused technology company specializing in AI-powered sales enablement software. Their platform empowers customer-facing teams to manage content, improve readiness, and enhance engagement to accelerate revenue. The company positions itself as an industry leader with a comprehensive suite of AI-driven tools and multiple subsidiaries enhancing its market reach. Technically, the website leverages modern web frameworks such as Next.js and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front, but the absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bigtincan.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bigtincan operates in the technology sector with a SaaS business model targeting enterprise sales and marketing teams. Their competitive advantage lies in integrating AI and machine learning for personalized coaching and content recommendations. The company maintains a strong partnership and subsidiary ecosystem, including Brainshark, ClearSlide, Modus, and Agnitio. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for their cloud-based platform. The website content and structure indicate a focus on large enterprises and global markets, supported by a consistent brand and comprehensive service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS and multiple security best practices in place. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but does not directly imply a security risk. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security frameworks and practices.
  2. Add incident response contact information and establish a vulnerability disclosure program.
  3. Implement and explicitly declare security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve trust and transparency.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating privacy compliance measures to align with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bigtincan
Description
Bigtincan provides AI-powered sales enablement software that helps enterprise teams manage content, drive readiness, enhance engagement, and accelerate revenue.
Key services
Sales enablement platform, Content management, Sales readiness, Sales engagement, AI-powered coaching and personalization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Marketo Munchkin, Various JavaScript libraries
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Marketo Munchkin, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Marketo Munchkin
Marketing tools
Marketo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and comprehensive sales enablement platform content
  3. Strong use of AI and modern technologies
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust but does not invalidate legitimacy
  7. Multiple subsidiary domains linked and referenced
  8. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React with Next.js framework, supported by a WordPress CMS backend for content management. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Marketo Munchkin. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable and secure SaaS platform, though hosting provider details were not explicitly identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bigtincan.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bigtincan.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.