Skip to main content

Security report for beetlebeetle.com

Beetle Beetle · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Beetle Beetle is a specialized agency focused on revamping websites for B2B SaaS companies, aiming to improve conversion rates and market positioning through refined messaging, design, and technical rebuilds. The website demonstrates a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging Webflow CMS and multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and PostHog. The technical infrastructure is modern and optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and formal policies are lacking. The absence of WHOIS data raises some concerns about domain registration legitimacy, but the professional site content and client testimonials support business credibility. Privacy and cookie policies are not evident, indicating room for compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching beetlebeetle.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
40
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche player in the SaaS website design market, serving fast-growing SaaS businesses with a full-service approach from research to development. Their client portfolio and testimonials indicate strong market acceptance and successful outcomes. The business model is service-based, focusing on website revamps that drive measurable conversion improvements. The lack of explicit contact information and formal policies on the site suggests a potential area for operational maturity. The extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools indicates a data-driven approach to client engagement and website optimization.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses multiple analytics and tracking services loaded asynchronously to minimize performance impact. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and no published security or incident response policies. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is found. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing website but could be enhanced with formal policies and headers to improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Provide clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Beetle Beetle
Description
We write, design and build high-converting websites for B2B SaaS products.
Key services
Messaging refinement, Website design revamp, Website rebuild with speed and SEO optimization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, PostHog, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Splide.js slider, Lenis smooth scrolling
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics and tracking scripts with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, PostHog, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, PostHog, Google Analytics via GTM, VWO
Marketing tools
VWO, Hotjar, PostHog, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional SaaS website design agency targeting B2B SaaS companies.
  2. Strong client testimonials and portfolio presence.
  3. Extensive use of modern analytics and marketing tools.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage content.
  5. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, domain registration status unclear.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks for smooth scrolling, sliders, and CMS filtering. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog, and VWO for optimization and user behavior tracking. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. Performance appears optimized with asynchronous script loading and responsive design. There is no indication of legacy or vulnerable libraries. The technical stack supports a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience, suitable for a professional SaaS marketing agency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with beetlebeetle.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beetlebeetle.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.