Skip to main content

Security report for avelana.cz

Avelana CZ s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avelana CZ s.r.o. is a small Czech company specializing in the design and realization of gardens, parks, and landscape projects primarily in South Bohemia, Central Bohemia, and Prague. With over 15 years of experience, the company offers a comprehensive range of services including garden design, park establishment, green roofs, swimming ponds, and tree care. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact and legal information, targeting general consumers and businesses seeking landscaping services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Brilo theme and incorporates modern tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Google Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and incident response details are missing. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain registration legitimacy, but the website content and structured data strongly support the business's authenticity. No security vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for a small landscaping business. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing explicit incident response contacts to improve security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avelana.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Avelana operates in the landscaping and garden design sector, serving regional markets in the Czech Republic. The company leverages a family tradition and extensive experience to position itself as a reliable partner for both private and public green space projects. Its business model focuses on end-to-end service delivery from design through realization and maintenance. The presence of job postings indicates growth and active operations. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and customer engagement through news updates and social media. Revenue streams likely derive from project contracts and consulting services. The partnership with Brilo for website development suggests a collaborative ecosystem supporting digital marketing and technical infrastructure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the lack of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tag management is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct performance optimization to improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Avelana CZ s.r.o
VAT number
CZ24294811
Registration number
24294811
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Avelana CZ s.r.o.
Description
Návrh a realizace krásných a praktických zahrad na míru. Zkušenosti, reference a profesionální tým! Realizace od A do Z. Již.Čechy, střední Čechy, Praha a okolí.
Key services
Návrh a realizace zahrad, Krajinné úpravy a revitalizace, Zakládání parků a péče o veřejnou zeleň, Koupací jezírka, Zelené střechy, Péče o stromy včetně rizikového kácení, Údržba veřejné i soukromé zeleně, Pokládky travních koberců a výsev trávníků, Dotační poradenství v oblasti zeleně
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery (implied by slick slider usage), slick slider, cookie-bar.js
Frameworks
WordPress theme: Brilo-theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. Clear contact information and legal data provided.
  4. Good SEO and technical implementation for a small business site.
  5. No visible security policies or incident response info.
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policy present and compliant.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a custom Brilo theme, integrating modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Google Analytics. The front-end uses slick slider for interactive content and cookie-bar.js for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and structured data implementation for SEO. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical anomaly but does not impact the website's operational infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avelana.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avelana.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.