Skip to main content

Security report for aurorait.com

Aurora Systems Consulting Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aurora Systems Consulting Inc. is a well-established IT and cybersecurity consulting firm with over 30 years of experience serving private and public sector organizations, including Fortune 1000 companies and government agencies. Their service portfolio includes cybersecurity consulting, vulnerability assessments, penetration testing, data loss prevention, and integration of advanced technologies such as Plurilock. The company positions itself as a trusted partner with federal purchasing capabilities, targeting a broad audience from small organizations to large enterprises. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and integrates modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, but explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency, which impacts overall trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could be improved to enhance security culture and compliance. Overall, Aurora Systems Consulting presents a professional and credible online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aurorait.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aurora Systems Consulting operates in the technology and government sectors, providing IT and cybersecurity services with a focus on consulting, assessments, and technology integration. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing market presence, federal sales expertise, and partnership with Plurilock technology. The business model combines product sales with consulting services, targeting a diverse customer base including government, healthcare, education, and enterprise clients. The company demonstrates growth potential through its broad service offerings and marketing efforts, though domain registration opacity may affect perception. Partnerships with technology providers like Plurilock enhance their ecosystem and service capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling including user consent for communications. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, absence of a published incident response or security contact page, and no visible vulnerability disclosure policy indicate gaps in security best practices. The missing cookie consent mechanism also suggests incomplete privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers, policies, and compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations, improving user transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Publish an incident response policy or dedicated security contact page to facilitate vulnerability reporting and demonstrate security readiness.
  4. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve trust.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to improve transparency and legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Aurora Systems Consulting Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aurora Systems Consulting Inc.
Description
Aurora helps organizations of all sizes—both private and public—to solve their most critical IT and cybersecurity needs, efficiently and cost-effectively. For more than 30 years, Aurora has provided trusted cybersecurity and IT services to Fortune 1000 companies, local government agencies, and federal institutions.
Key services
Cybersecurity consulting, Vulnerability and compliance assessments, Penetration testing, Data loss prevention, HIPAA security and compliance audits, Plurilock technology integration, Federal sales and procurement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Plurilock scripts
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security-focused plugins and scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact forms with consent checkbox

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional IT and cybersecurity consulting firm with a broad service portfolio
  3. Clear contact information including phone, email, physical address, and contact forms
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  8. Social media icons present but URLs not explicitly provided in HTML
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates multiple third-party scripts including Google Tag Manager for analytics and Klaviyo for marketing automation. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized with responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is current and well-maintained, though some improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were identified in the visible content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aurorait.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aurorait.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.