AUDITTRAILS Networks GmbH operates as a specialized provider of Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) and Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) solutions, targeting businesses requiring compliance and quality management support. The company positions itself as a trusted partner in the German market, offering consulting and software services tailored to regulatory and operational needs. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, with modern typography and responsive design, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain legitimacy and age, which could impact trust. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS likely enabled but lacking advanced security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, suggesting room for improvement in compliance and user trust. Overall, the website presents a credible business front but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures to strengthen its market position and customer confidence.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Critical
Unable to retrieve SSL certificate
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
54
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention audittrails.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for audittrails.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company targets a niche market segment focused on ISMS and LIMS, which are critical for regulated industries such as pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, and technology. Their business model is B2B, providing specialized consulting and software solutions. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a small-sized enterprise profile. The use of Google Tag Manager and Rank Math PRO indicates an investment in marketing and SEO, aiming to capture relevant business leads. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and absence of contact information on the site may limit direct customer engagement and raise concerns for potential clients. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data, suggesting a focused, independent operation.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, which are best practices for modern web security. No explicit privacy, cookie, or incident response policies are found, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details further reduces trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and ensuring transparent incident response mechanisms.
Recommendations
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Verify and publish domain WHOIS information or use a reputable domain registrar to improve trust.
Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance credibility.
Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
AUDITTRAILS Networks GmbH
Description
AUDITTRAILS Networks GmbH is a company specializing in Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) and Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS). They provide services and solutions to support compliance and quality management in organizations.
Key services
ISMS consulting, LIMS solutions, Compliance support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Inter font
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
40/100
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Marketing tools
Rank Math PRO
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Content is in German and focused on ISMS and LIMS services.
No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML.
No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
Website uses modern fonts and Elementor page builder on WordPress.
Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered in the raw WHOIS output.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web fonts (Inter) and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site appears mobile-optimized with good SEO practices via Rank Math PRO. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. However, the lack of advanced security configurations and missing WHOIS data indicate technical risks that could affect business operations and user trust. Hosting provider details are not evident, and no CDN or advanced caching mechanisms were identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements in security and transparency.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with audittrails.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review audittrails.com.