Skip to main content

Security report for atriumiot.com

Atrium · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atrium appears to be a technology company specializing in IoT solutions, providing a user portal for device or service management. The website analyzed is a login page, indicating a focus on secure access to IoT services. The technical infrastructure leverages Microsoft Azure DNS and Application Insights for telemetry, indicating a modern cloud-based hosting environment. The site uses Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, ensuring usability across devices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and telemetry in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the website is functional but basic in content and security disclosures, suitable for a small to medium-sized IoT technology provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atriumiot.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atrium operates in the IoT technology sector, targeting business and enterprise customers who require device management portals. The business model likely involves SaaS or platform services for IoT device monitoring and control. Founded in 2021, the company is relatively new and positioned in a niche market. The absence of detailed business information and contact data on the login page suggests a focus on authenticated users rather than public marketing. The use of Azure services indicates a partnership or reliance on Microsoft cloud infrastructure. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and uses Microsoft Application Insights for monitoring, which is a positive indicator. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represent areas for improvement. No privacy or incident response policies are publicly available, which could impact compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible from the public page.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance website content with business and contact information to improve credibility and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atrium
Description
Atrium provides IoT solutions, likely focusing on portal access for IoT device management or monitoring.
Key services
IoT device management, User portal access
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Azure DNS, Microsoft Application Insights, Bootstrap 5
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Azure
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Application Insights for telemetry

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Application Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Atrium IoT services.
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page.
  3. No contact information or security policies publicly disclosed.
  4. Uses Azure DNS and Microsoft Application Insights for hosting and telemetry.
  5. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  6. No visible security headers in HTML content.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. Content is minimal and focused on login functionality.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate domain with consistent registration details.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 5 for UI, Microsoft Azure DNS for domain hosting, and Application Insights for telemetry and analytics. The HTML is well-structured with responsive design elements. Performance is expected to be moderate given the cloud hosting and minimal content. There is no CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers are technical risks that should be addressed. The site is mobile optimized but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is minimal with no metadata beyond the page title.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atriumiot.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atriumiot.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.