Skip to main content

Security report for asolvi.com

Asolvi · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asolvi is a specialist provider of field service management software aimed at improving operational efficiency and customer service for businesses in the field service sector. The website presents a professional and focused business offering, targeting organizations that require software solutions to manage field operations effectively. The company appears to operate in the technology sector with a SaaS business model, although detailed corporate information such as founding year or company size is not disclosed. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Kadence Blocks and Google Fonts, indicating a modern but standard CMS infrastructure. The site is accessible and mobile-optimized with good design quality and user experience. However, there is limited evidence of advanced technical frameworks or hosting details. Performance is moderate, and SEO and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the website lacks visible security headers, privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information for incident response or data protection officers. The WHOIS data is unavailable, showing no domain registration match, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and free from adult or explicit content. However, the absence of critical compliance and security information, combined with missing WHOIS data, results in a moderate risk profile. Strategic improvements in transparency, security posture, and compliance documentation are recommended to enhance trust and credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asolvi.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Asolvi occupies a niche market position as a specialist field service management software provider. Its business model is likely SaaS, focusing on operational and customer service improvements for field service businesses. The website content suggests a small-sized company with a technology industry focus. There is no evidence of parent companies or subsidiaries. The lack of detailed business information and contact data limits the ability to assess revenue streams or growth indicators. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and targets professional business customers. No partnerships or ecosystem integrations were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is low. Key vulnerabilities include the absence of HTTPS verification in the provided data, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and no visible privacy or cookie policies indicating GDPR compliance. There is no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits readiness for security incidents. The lack of contact channels for security issues further reduces the security culture visibility. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but the absence of security best practices is a concern. Compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations are evident due to missing policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify its presence site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details.
  5. Regularly audit and update website dependencies and CMS plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asolvi
Description
Asolvi provides specialist field service management software designed to improve operational efficiency and customer service for field service businesses.
Key services
Field service management software, Operational efficiency tools, Customer service management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Kadence Blocks, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Manrope, Inter)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain is unregistered, which is a significant trust concern.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies were found in the provided HTML content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses were detected in the content.
  5. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with Kadence Blocks and Google Fonts.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. Website content is professional and focused on field service management software.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Kadence Blocks and Google Fonts, indicating a modern but common technology stack. The site is mobile-optimized and has a good design quality with clear navigation. However, there is no evidence of advanced frameworks or hosting provider details. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with standard meta tags. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests limited data collection. Technical debt appears low but could be improved with enhanced security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asolvi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asolvi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.