Skip to main content

Security report for arrabiata.de

Arrabiata Solutions · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Arrabiata Solutions is a German-based digital agency specializing in technology and digital consulting services. The website presents a professional image with a clear focus on guiding clients through digital transformation journeys. The company targets businesses seeking digital solutions and consulting. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress CMS using the Astra theme, enhanced with SEO and marketing tools such as Yoast SEO, HubSpot, and Google Tag Manager. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented to comply with privacy regulations. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial due to missing privacy and terms of service documents. Overall, the website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arrabiata.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention arrabiata.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for arrabiata.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector as a digital agency, focusing on digital transformation and consulting services. Its business model revolves around providing tailored digital solutions to clients, likely SMEs or enterprises in Germany. The website content and metadata suggest a small-sized company with consistent branding. The absence of detailed contact information and certifications limits the visibility of trust signals. The use of HubSpot and Google Tag Manager indicates an active marketing and analytics strategy. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned. The company appears to maintain a moderate market position with potential for growth through enhanced transparency and security practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, ensuring encrypted communication. Cookie consent is actively managed, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may impact trust and readiness. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the security posture would benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to build trust and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide explicit contact information to improve user trust and engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Arrabiata Solutions
Description
Wir gehen gemeinsam den digitalen Weg zu Ihrer Erfolgsgeschichte.
Key services
Digital consulting, Technology solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Astra Theme, Yoast SEO, HubSpot scripts, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics via GTM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Google Analytics via GTM
Marketing tools
HubSpot, CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital agency based in Germany.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Astra theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
  3. Implements cookie consent via CookieYes and Cookie Law Info plugin.
  4. Includes HubSpot and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  7. No security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Astra theme, which is known for performance and flexibility. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and marketing/analytics are handled through HubSpot and Google Tag Manager scripts. Cookie consent is managed by CookieYes and Cookie Law Info plugins, indicating compliance efforts. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design. Performance appears moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization detected. The absence of security headers and detailed hosting information suggests room for technical improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arrabiata.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arrabiata.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.