Skip to main content

Security report for arnold-robot.com

Arnold Robot · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Arnold Robot is a technology company offering a chatbot platform designed to enhance employee engagement and feedback collection through conversational surveys. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence, leveraging WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The platform targets companies and HR teams aiming to improve workplace communication and employee satisfaction. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and incident response contacts are not evident. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the association with the established parent company Alma Career. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and providing clearer direct contact details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arnold-robot.com

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Arnold Robot operates in the HR technology sector, focusing on employee surveys and engagement through chatbot technology. The business model is SaaS-based, targeting medium to large enterprises seeking to improve internal communication and employee satisfaction. The company leverages partnerships within the Alma Career family and related recruitment platforms, enhancing its market reach. The website's multilingual support and case studies demonstrate a customer-centric approach and regional market adaptation. Growth indicators include active client references and integration with recognized HR brands. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and legal compliance, positioning it as a credible player in the employee engagement niche.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent management, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS suggests room for improvement in hardening the web application against common threats. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of explicit incident response contacts or security policies limits transparency in handling security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business type but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance standards such as ISO 27001 or NIST frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance direct contact availability on the website to facilitate customer and security communications.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR and privacy regulation compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Arnold Robot
Description
Arnold's mission is to fine-tune the way companies and teams function so that people feel good at work and come together to achieve their goals.
Key services
Employee and candidate surveys, Onboarding support, Engagement and motivation improvement, Survey result reporting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor page builder, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, LmcCookieConsentManager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-focused on employee engagement chatbot services.
  3. Strong SEO and structured data usage.
  4. Multiple languages supported (English, Czech, Slovak).
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and linked to parent company domain.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main site pages.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No forms with personal data fields detected in main HTML content.
  10. Use of modern WordPress plugins and frameworks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization, indicating a modern and maintainable CMS environment. JavaScript libraries include jQuery 3.7.1 and cookie consent management scripts. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are used for analytics and marketing tracking. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities in script loading and caching. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well addressed, contributing to a positive user experience. The technical stack is appropriate for the business scale but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 57/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arnold-robot.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arnold-robot.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.