Skip to main content

Security report for aplikacevobraze.cz

Galileo Corporation s.r.o. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Galileo Corporation s.r.o. is a Czech company specializing in digital communication solutions for public sector entities such as municipalities, cities, schools, and contributory organizations. Their flagship offerings include a mobile application (V OBRAZE), SMS and email communication tools, integration with social media, digital official boards, and electronic file services. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for digital transformation and communication in local government, serving over 2500 clients. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content tailored to their target audience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks like jQuery and Bootstrap, ensuring responsiveness and accessibility. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a detailed privacy policy and a robust cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in HTTP security headers and explicit SSL configuration verification. Overall, the website and business demonstrate a solid market position and trustworthy digital infrastructure.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of aplikacevobraze.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aplikacevobraze.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Galileo Corporation operates primarily in the government and technology sectors, focusing on B2G and B2B markets. Their competitive advantage lies in offering integrated communication tools that simplify citizen engagement and comply with legislative requirements. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, support services, and consulting. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including social media platforms and analytics providers. Growth indicators include a large client base and active content updates. Strategic observations highlight the company's focus on digital transformation in public administration and leveraging mobile and social media channels for communication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with a cookie consent mechanism and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers and lack of WHOIS transparency are areas of concern. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies publicly available. GDPR compliance is indicated by the privacy policy and cookie consent. The company should enhance security by implementing standard headers, conducting regular security audits, and publishing incident response contacts to improve trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Verify and enforce HTTPS site-wide with strong TLS configurations.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security assessments of the CMS and third-party libraries to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS data transparency or provide official domain registration information on the website to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Galileo Corporation s.r.o.
Description
Partner pro samosprávy a příspěvkové organizace v oblasti digitalizace a komunikace s občany. Nabízí jedinečný komunikační nástroj pro informování a komunikaci s občany, včetně mobilní aplikace V OBRAZE, SMS a e-mail info, využívaný více než 2500 samospráv.
Key services
Mobilní aplikace V OBRAZE, SMS komunikace, E-mail komunikace, Propojení s Facebookem, Digitální úřední desky, Webové stránky, Elektronická spisová služba, Vizuální identita
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper.js, CookieYes cookie consent, FontAwesome icons, Popper.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
doubleclick.net
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Smartlook
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Strong focus on public sector digital communication solutions.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance.
  4. Multiple customer testimonials enhance trust.
  5. No WHOIS data available, which is a minor concern.
  6. No visible security headers in provided data; recommend improvement.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and responsive design.
  8. Contact form collects personal data with CAPTCHA for spam prevention.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or specialized CMS tailored for public sector clients, leveraging jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper.js for sliders, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no explicit hosting provider information. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated libraries and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 42/100High28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aplikacevobraze.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aplikacevobraze.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.