Skip to main content

Security report for aplikacevobraze.cz

Galileo Corporation s.r.o. · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Galileo Corporation s.r.o. is a Czech company specializing in digital communication solutions for municipalities, cities, schools, and public organizations. Their flagship offerings include a mobile application (V OBRAZE), SMS and email communication tools, integration with social media, digital official boards, and AI products. The company serves over 2500 clients, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the public sector digitalization space. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging tailored to government and public institutions. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js, and incorporates analytics and cookie consent tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS and anti-spam measures on forms, though some security headers are not confirmed and could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and GDPR adherence. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional web presence and business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aplikacevobraze.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Galileo Corporation operates in the government and public sector technology market, focusing on digital communication and information dissemination tools. Their competitive advantage lies in integrated solutions that automate communication across multiple channels from a single system, reducing administrative overhead for clients. The business model is B2G/B2B with a strong client base of municipalities and public organizations. Revenue likely derives from software licensing, support, and consulting services. The company demonstrates growth through adoption of AI products and expanding communication channels. Partnerships with major app stores and social media platforms enhance their ecosystem. The company maintains a strong reputation supported by client testimonials and compliance with legislative requirements, which is critical in public sector engagements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and CAPTCHA protection on forms to mitigate spam. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms aligns with privacy regulations. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options are not confirmed and should be implemented or verified to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact is a gap that could be addressed to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but can be strengthened with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
  4. Enhance server-side validation and anti-CSRF protections on all forms to prevent injection and forgery attacks.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Galileo Corporation s.r.o.
Description
Partner pro samosprávy a příspěvkové organizace v oblasti digitalizace a komunikace s občany. Nabízí jedinečný komunikační nástroj pro informování a komunikaci s občany, včetně mobilní aplikace V OBRAZE, SMS a e-mail komunikace.
Key services
Mobilní aplikace V OBRAZE, SMS komunikace, E-mail komunikace, Propojení s Facebookem, Digitální úřední desky, Webové stránky, Elektronická spisová služba, AI produkty
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper.js, Highslide JS, Popper.js, Mmenu.js, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes cookie consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • CAPTCHA on contact form to prevent spam

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-573815340)
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (G-W5L7J3RB1P)
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Professional and consistent branding.
  3. Strong focus on communication tools for municipalities and organizations.
  4. Multiple contact methods including email, phone, and contact form with CAPTCHA.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  6. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may warrant further investigation.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Swiper.js for sliders, and Highslide for image handling. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, along with CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for accessibility and SEO with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. There is no explicit hosting provider information. The technical implementation is solid with room for improvement in security header deployment and potential performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aplikacevobraze.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aplikacevobraze.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.