Skip to main content

Security report for alte-schule-dobra.de

Alte Schule Dobra · Other · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Alte Schule Dobra website represents a small community and tourism project focused on revitalizing a historic building in the Dobra district of Bad Liebenwerda, Germany. The site provides information about the building's transformation into a tourist information center, community event space, and commercial exhibition area supporting local businesses. The project is supported by European Union and regional funding, as well as local government and tourism associations. The website content is basic but relevant to its target audience of tourists, local residents, and regional economic actors. Technically, the website is built using Incomedia WebSite X5 Pro CMS with jQuery and standard web technologies. Hosting appears to be provided by cyon.ch based on nameservers. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, which is a significant security shortfall. There are no privacy or cookie policies, no contact emails or phone numbers, and no analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal digital maturity and compliance gaps. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers reduces the site's security posture. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, which limits exposure but also reduces user engagement capabilities. The site does not provide incident response or security policy information. Overall, the site is safe in terms of content but lacks modern security and privacy best practices. The overall risk is moderate due to missing security and privacy features. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, providing clear contact information, and improving mobile and accessibility features to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alte-schule-dobra.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alte Schule Dobra operates as a small-scale community and tourism service entity focused on revitalizing a historic building to serve multiple local functions. Its market positioning is local/regional, supported by EU and regional funding programs. The business model centers on providing tourist information, community event space, and commercial exhibition opportunities for local businesses. Revenue streams likely derive from public funding and possibly rental or event fees. The target customers include tourists visiting the region, local residents, and regional economic actors. The partnership ecosystem includes the European Union, Land Brandenburg, the city of Bad Liebenwerda, and the Tourismusverband Elbe-Elster-Land. The website content and structure indicate a modest digital presence consistent with a small community project.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site does not collect user data via forms, which reduces attack surface but also limits engagement. No known vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Compliance with GDPR is questionable due to missing policies. The security culture appears minimal, likely due to the site's small scale and community focus. Improving security posture by implementing HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance is recommended to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure data transmission.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for user support and incident reporting.
  4. Include security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alte Schule Dobra
Description
Revitalisierung der Alten Schule Dobra; touristische Anlaufstelle im Ort für Kurgäste und Besucher; Dorfgemeinschaftshaus als Veranstaltungs- und Ausstellungsraum; Ausstellungsfläche für lokale/regionalen Wirtschaft
Key services
Tourist information, Event and exhibition space, Commercial offers and information for local/regional economy
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Incomedia WebSite X5 Pro 2021.2.8, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small community/tourism project site with basic content and navigation.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data; likely HTTP only.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  6. Site uses Incomedia WebSite X5 Pro CMS and jQuery library.
  7. External links mostly to official EU, regional government, and local city/tourism sites.
  8. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected in the HTML content.
  9. No social media links or email addresses found.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Incomedia WebSite X5 Pro CMS using jQuery and standard HTML/CSS/JavaScript. Hosting is via cyon.ch as indicated by nameservers. The site uses multiple CSS stylesheets and JavaScript files for UI and menu functionality. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. Mobile responsiveness is basic with a hamburger menu for navigation. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD. No analytics or tracking scripts are included, indicating limited data collection. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, which are critical technical shortcomings. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated and lacking modern security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alte-schule-dobra.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alte-schule-dobra.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.