Skip to main content

Security report for akskp.cz

Šetina, Komendová & Partners s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Šetina, Komendová & Partners s.r.o. is a small law firm based in Brno, Czech Republic, specializing in IT law, subsidies, and business corporation law. The firm offers legal defense, contract negotiation, and advisory services both domestically and internationally. Their website reflects a professional and client-focused approach, emphasizing imagination and enthusiasm for legal work. Technically, the site is built on the Webnode CMS platform, leveraging Amazon Cloudfront CDN for asset delivery, and integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a cookie consent mechanism, indicating basic privacy compliance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is reasonable for a law firm. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally presented, with clear contact information and a privacy policy.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of akskp.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akskp.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm targets businesses and individuals requiring legal services in IT and corporate law, positioning itself as a client-centric and innovative legal partner. The business model is service-based, relying on expertise and personalized legal solutions. The website content and structure support a professional image, though the absence of terms of service and incident response information suggests areas for improvement. The firm uses standard marketing and analytics tools to understand visitor behavior and improve engagement. No social media presence is evident, which may limit outreach. The company appears stable with a clear legal identity and registration in the Czech Republic.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, and no incident response contacts are provided, which are recommended best practices for professional service websites. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking but is managed with consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a dedicated terms of service page to clarify legal usage and liabilities.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider expanding digital presence with verified social media channels to increase trust and outreach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Šetina, Komendová & Partners s.r.o., Law Office
VAT number
CZ06204872
Registration number
06204872
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Šetina, Komendová & Partners s.r.o.
Description
We are attorneys at law focused on protecting and developing clients' assets, defending rights in court, public authorities, and negotiations. Experienced in IT law, subsidies, and business corporations in Czech Republic and internationally. We offer tailored legal solutions and proactive legal updates.
Key services
Legal defense, Contract negotiation, IT law, Subsidies, Business corporation law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cloudfront CDN, Webnode CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, common for professional services.
  3. Site uses modern tracking and analytics tools with cookie consent.
  4. No security.txt or explicit incident response contacts found.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with company email and phone.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Site is multilingual with English and Czech versions.
  8. Hosting uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN for static assets.
  9. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage or main content for data collection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webnode CMS platform, utilizing Amazon Cloudfront CDN for static content delivery, which supports good performance and scalability. The tech stack includes Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior insights. The site is mobile responsive with adaptive CSS loading strategies. However, SEO optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. No advanced frameworks or platforms were detected. The site performs moderately well but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements. No broken elements or errors were observed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akskp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akskp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.