Skip to main content

Security report for akskp.cz

Šetina, Komendová & Partners s.r.o., Law Office · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Šetina, Komendová & Partners s.r.o. is a small law office based in Brno, Czech Republic, specializing in IT law, subsidies, and business corporation legal services. The firm emphasizes client-focused, innovative legal solutions and has international experience. Their website reflects a professional and trustworthy presence with clear contact information and a privacy-aware approach. Technically, the site is built on the Webnode CMS platform, uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN, and integrates common analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers are missing. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for small professional firms. Overall, the site is well-designed, accessible, and compliant with basic privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akskp.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the legal services sector, targeting businesses and individuals needing legal counsel in IT and corporate law. Their business model is service-based, relying on professional expertise and client relationships. The firm positions itself as a trusted legal partner with a focus on proactive and customized solutions. The website content and contact details support credibility and professionalism. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data. Marketing efforts include Google Ads and user behavior tracking via Hotjar, indicating a moderate digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries were detected. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security governance. The WHOIS privacy protection is justified but limits external verification of domain ownership. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small professional services website but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure they do not introduce vulnerabilities or privacy risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and more comprehensive privacy documentation to meet higher compliance standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Šetina, Komendová & Partners s.r.o., Law Office
VAT number
CZ06204872
Registration number
06204872
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Šetina, Komendová & Partners s.r.o., Law Office
Description
We are attorneys at law focused on protecting and developing clients' assets, defending rights in courts and negotiations, with experience in IT law, subsidies, and business corporations in Czech Republic and internationally. We emphasize client needs, innovative solutions, and proactive legal updates.
Key services
Legal defense in courts and public authorities, Contract negotiation, IT law, Subsidies, Business corporations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cloudfront CDN, Webnode CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry policy.
  3. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL and standard security practices.
  4. Cookie consent banner and privacy policy present, indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy found.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with company email, phone, and address.
  7. No forms detected on the main page; contact likely via email or phone.
  8. Uses common analytics and marketing tools (Google Analytics, Hotjar, Google Ads).
  9. Content is professional, relevant, and consistent with a law office.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webnode CMS platform and leverages Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, contributing to moderate performance. It uses modern JavaScript libraries for analytics and user behavior tracking, including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic but includes essential meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. The technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akskp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akskp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.