Skip to main content

Security report for aitre.cc

AITRE · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AITRE is a technology-focused platform providing an all-in-one AI API gateway that aggregates multiple leading AI models such as OpenAI's GPT, Anthropic's Claude, Google's Gemini, Meta's LLaMA, Mistral AI, and Midjourney. The service targets developers and enterprises seeking simplified and cost-effective access to diverse AI models through a unified API interface. The platform emphasizes ease of use, low cost, and zero barriers to entry, supported by detailed documentation and recommended client software. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks including jQuery, Swiper, GSAP, and others to deliver a responsive and visually appealing user experience. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and client-side scripts to deter developer tool usage, although some standard security headers and policies are missing. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific disclosures. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small technology startup with a clear business model and market positioning.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aitre.cc

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as an API aggregator and proxy for multiple AI model providers, offering developers a one-stop solution to access various AI services without needing multiple accounts or dealing with IP blocking issues. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its cost savings compared to official providers and its integration of popular open-source clients. The target market includes developers, AI enthusiasts, and enterprises requiring AI capabilities. The company appears to be a small startup founded in 2025, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. Partnerships are implied through recommended open-source projects and client software. Revenue likely derives from API usage fees at discounted rates. The presence of social media links and detailed API documentation supports community engagement and developer adoption.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and client-side measures to prevent unauthorized inspection or tampering via developer tools. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent or GDPR-specific mechanisms evident. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small startup but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AITRE
Description
Aitre provides aggregation and distribution services for major AI models from various leading service providers worldwide. It offers affordable and user-friendly access to large-scale language models such as GPT, Claude, DeepSeek, LLaMA, Midjourney, ensuring easy deployment.
Key services
Aggregation of AI models, API gateway for AI services, Access to multiple AI clients, Developer tutorials and documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap Grid, Font Awesome, Swiper, Fancybox, GSAP, Smooth Scroll, ScrollTrigger, ScrollTo, Swup
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Prevention of right-click context menu
  • Blocking common developer tools shortcuts
  • Detection and redirect on developer tools open

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a multi-model AI API gateway service aggregating major AI providers.
  2. Content is developer-focused with detailed descriptions of AI models and client software.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via Twitter link and popup.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy compliance notices detected.
  5. Security measures include HTTPS and client-side blocking of developer tools and context menu.
  6. WHOIS data is privacy protected but domain age matches business claims.
  7. No signs of malicious or adult content; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack with libraries such as jQuery, Swiper for sliders, GSAP for animations, and Swup for page transitions, indicating a focus on smooth user experience and interactivity. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some animations and scripts that may impact load times but contribute to a polished design. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. The site employs client-side scripts to block developer tools and right-click context menus, which may deter casual inspection but can be circumvented by advanced users. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small technology startup but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aitre.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aitre.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.