Skip to main content

Security report for agrorisk.cz

AgroRisk · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AgroRisk is a Czech Republic based service providing an early warning system for negative weather impacts in agriculture. The website is targeted primarily at farmers and agricultural professionals within the Czech Republic. The business operates in a niche sector focused on agricultural risk management, offering timely weather alerts to mitigate potential damages. The website content is professional and relevant, with a consistent branding approach and good user experience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Leaflet.js for map rendering and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks important security headers and visible privacy policies. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which limits trust analysis and reduces business credibility scores. Overall, the site is functional and serves its purpose but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of agrorisk.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agrorisk.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AgroRisk occupies a specialized market niche providing weather-related risk warnings for agriculture in the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in delivering localized, timely weather alerts to farmers, helping them reduce losses from adverse weather conditions. The business model appears service-oriented, likely subscription or usage-based, targeting agricultural professionals and enterprises. The website does not disclose detailed company information, limiting insights into revenue streams or partnerships. The absence of contact details and certifications suggests a small-scale operation focused on core service delivery. Growth potential exists in expanding service coverage or integrating with agricultural advisory platforms. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website content. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced transparency and compliance to build greater trust with users and regulators.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published privacy policy and incident response contacts represents compliance gaps, particularly under GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. Data protection practices appear minimal, and incident response readiness cannot be assessed due to missing information. The security culture seems basic, with room for improvement in transparency and technical safeguards. Recommendations include implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop and communicate an incident response plan with dedicated contact channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AgroRisk
Description
Systém včasné výstrahy před negativními dopady počasí v zemědělství
Key services
Early warning system for negative weather impacts in agriculture
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Leaflet.js, Google Fonts, CookieConsent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Google Tag Manager with consent mode

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with a basic banner.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the site.
  6. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager with consent mode.
  7. Website content is in Czech language and targets agricultural users.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes a modern JavaScript stack including Leaflet.js for interactive map rendering and Google services for analytics and tag management. External resources are loaded from reputable domains such as fonts.googleapis.com and cdn.kreatura.cz. The site is mobile responsive and uses a custom CSS bundle for styling. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly identified. Hosting appears to be distributed, with map tiles served from kreatura.cz CDN. Technical debt is low based on the visible frontend code, but the lack of security headers and privacy documentation indicates areas for modernization. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts without visible integrity checks and incomplete privacy compliance implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agrorisk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agrorisk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.