Skip to main content

Security report for agrorisk.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AgroRisk is a Czech Republic-based service providing an early warning system for negative weather impacts in agriculture. The website is professionally designed with a focus on delivering timely weather alerts to farmers and agricultural professionals. The content is relevant and well-structured, targeting a niche audience in the agricultural sector. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Leaflet.js for mapping, Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations. However, the absence of a visible privacy policy and terms of service, as well as missing contact information, limits the site's compliance and business credibility. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and consent-based analytics, but lacks security headers and detailed incident response information. Overall, the site is accessible and safe, with no signs of WAF blocking or malicious content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agrorisk.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AgroRisk operates in the agriculture sector, offering a specialized weather warning service to mitigate risks from adverse weather conditions. The business model appears service-oriented, likely subscription or free access with potential monetization through partnerships or data services. The website's market position is not explicitly stated, but the focused service suggests a niche regional player in the Czech Republic. The lack of detailed company information, certifications, or contact details limits external validation of business scale or partnerships. The technology stack and content quality indicate a medium-sized operation with room for growth in transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The security maturity of AgroRisk is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism with Google Tag Manager configured to deny analytics storage by default, updating consent upon user approval. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited readiness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  3. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Systém včasné výstrahy před negativními dopady počasí v zemědělství
Key services
early warning system for negative weather impacts in agriculture
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Leaflet.js, Google Fonts, cookieconsent-basic.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Uses HTTPS
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Google Tag Manager with consent default denied

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the page
  6. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics with consent management
  7. Content is focused on agricultural weather warnings in Czech language
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  9. No security headers detected in provided data
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern front-end stack with Leaflet.js for interactive maps, Google Fonts for typography, and Google Analytics with Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics. The site loads map tiles from a third-party CDN (cdn.kreatura.cz), indicating reliance on external hosting for map data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and deferred cookie consent scripts. Mobile optimization is good, supported by viewport meta tags and responsive CSS. No CMS or backend technologies were identified from the HTML snippet. The site lacks visible forms or interactive input elements, simplifying security considerations but limiting user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 48/100High31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agrorisk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agrorisk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.