Skip to main content

Security report for adamkrogh.com

Adam Krogh · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adam Krogh's website is a personal portfolio showcasing his work as a full-stack developer, featuring projects and open source contributions. The site targets developers, collaborators, and potential clients interested in software development. The business model is centered on personal branding and sharing technical expertise through project showcases and open source code. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern technologies such as React, Gatsby, and Bootstrap, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Tag Manager, but privacy and cookie policies are absent, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is moderate; the site uses HTTPS and service workers but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No forms or direct contact emails are present, with contact primarily via social media links. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of adamkrogh.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adamkrogh.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site positions Adam Krogh as an individual software developer with a focus on full-stack development and open source projects. The portfolio highlights key projects using technologies like C#, React, Angular, Python, and Ionic, appealing to a technical audience. The business model is personal branding and community engagement through open source. The domain age (since 2009) supports a long-term professional presence. The absence of direct business contact info suggests a low-scale operation focused on reputation and networking rather than direct sales. The linked social media profiles enhance credibility and outreach. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS and service worker registration for PWA features. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the security posture. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit interaction. Absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance risk under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to harden the site.
  3. Add privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Provide a secure contact form or direct contact email for professional inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit analytics and tracking for privacy compliance and minimize data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Adam Krogh
Description
Adam Krogh is a full-stack developer interested in all aspects of creating great software. The website serves as a personal portfolio showcasing featured projects and open source contributions.
Key services
Software development, Open source contributions, Project showcases
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, C#, Ionic, Angular, Python, Canvas API, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
React, Gatsby, Bootstrap
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Uses service worker for PWA capabilities
  • No forms detected to collect user data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio for a full-stack developer.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact form or direct email addresses provided.
  4. Social media profiles are linked for contact and credibility.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled for domain.
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including React and Gatsby, with Bootstrap for styling and FontAwesome for icons. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with semantic HTML. Hosting appears to be via NameCheap with DNS servers from the registrar. Performance is likely fast given static site generation with Gatsby. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. No forms or dynamic user input detected, reducing complexity and risk. The site uses a service worker for offline capabilities, indicating progressive web app features. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and robust with minor gaps in security headers and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100 −8Medium34 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adamkrogh.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adamkrogh.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.