Skip to main content

Security report for aceoffice.cz

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AceIT Office operates a web-based business software platform powered by Group-Office, providing enterprise-level office management solutions. The website serves primarily as a login portal for authenticated users rather than a public-facing marketing site. The platform leverages ExtJS 3 for its frontend interface, indicating a mature but somewhat dated technology stack. The domain aceoffice.cz has been registered since 2012, consistent with the longevity of the software product. However, the website lacks publicly accessible business information, privacy policies, or contact details, limiting transparency for external visitors. Technically, the website employs HTTPS with a security token mechanism for AJAX requests, which is a positive security practice. Nonetheless, the absence of standard security headers and advanced bot protection on the login form suggests room for improvement in security hardening. The site does not appear to use any analytics or advertising technologies, indicating a focus on internal users rather than marketing or tracking external visitors. From a security and compliance perspective, the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing contact information, represents a compliance gap, especially under GDPR requirements. The site’s security posture is moderate but could benefit from implementing additional security headers and bot mitigation techniques. Overall, the risk to external users is low given the site’s nature as a login portal, but the lack of transparency and compliance documentation could impact trustworthiness. Strategically, AceIT Office should prioritize publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and providing contact information to improve compliance and user trust. These steps will also support better security posture and regulatory adherence, which are critical for enterprise software providers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aceoffice.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AceIT Office appears to be a specialized business software provider leveraging the Group-Office platform to deliver office management solutions. The domain age and technology stack suggest a stable, mature product offering. The business model likely revolves around software licensing or subscription for enterprise clients. The absence of public marketing content or contact details indicates a focus on existing customers or partners rather than direct consumer engagement. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The company targets business users requiring office productivity and collaboration tools. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the website. The lack of public-facing business intelligence limits competitive analysis but suggests a niche or B2B focus.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of security tokens in AJAX requests. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. The login form lacks visible CAPTCHA or bot mitigation, potentially exposing it to brute force attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting readiness transparency. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies on the website to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add CAPTCHA or other bot protection mechanisms on login forms to mitigate brute force and automated attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security or abuse contacts to enhance incident response capabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update the technology stack to address potential security vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
ExtJS 3, JavaScript, Group-Office
Frameworks
ExtJS, Group-Office
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Security token used in AJAX requests

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Group-Office based software branded as AceIT Office.
  2. No public-facing content such as privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found in the HTML.
  3. No contact information or business details publicly displayed.
  4. Website uses ExtJS 3 framework and Group-Office platform.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  6. Security headers are missing or not detectable from HTML content.
  7. Login form uses security token but lacks visible advanced bot protection.
  8. No social media or external marketing links present.
  9. Content is minimal and focused on authenticated user access.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the ExtJS 3 JavaScript framework and the Group-Office platform, indicating a mature but somewhat dated technology stack. The extensive use of JavaScript files and modular scripts suggests a complex frontend application optimized for authenticated users. The site uses HTTPS, which is a positive security indicator. Mobile optimization is basic, with separate CSS for mobile devices but no advanced responsive design detected. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of meta descriptions, Open Graph tags, or structured data. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks evident. Performance is moderate, likely impacted by the large number of JavaScript files loaded. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business use case but could benefit from modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aceoffice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aceoffice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.