Skip to main content

Security report for 84302764.xyz

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

html-load.com is a newly established technology service provider specializing in real-time obfuscation of web resources such as JavaScript, CSS, and HTML to protect against unauthorized access and code theft. The company targets developers and businesses seeking enhanced security for their web assets, offering a developer-friendly API and performance-optimized solutions. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging and a modern design, supported by multi-CDN infrastructure from Cloudflare, AWS, and Google Cloud to ensure fast and reliable delivery. From a technical perspective, the site employs modern web technologies including Google reCAPTCHA for form security and uses reputable CDN providers for hosting and performance. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good design and user experience. However, there is a lack of explicit security headers and no published privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. The domain is very new, registered in November 2023, consistent with the startup nature of the business. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and form protection via reCAPTCHA, but the absence of security headers and privacy documentation reduces the overall security maturity. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found, but improvements are needed in policy transparency and security best practices. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and targeted at a niche market with a solid technical foundation. Strategic enhancements in privacy compliance, security policies, and transparency will improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 84302764.xyz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

html-load.com operates in the technology sector, focusing on web security through obfuscation services. Its business model revolves around providing a SaaS/API platform for real-time code protection, targeting developers and enterprises concerned with intellectual property and security. The company leverages partnerships with major cloud providers for infrastructure, indicating a scalable and reliable service offering. Market positioning is niche but relevant given increasing concerns about web asset security. The lack of direct contact details and limited public business information suggests a small startup phase. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and improving compliance and trust signals.

Security posture

The security maturity of html-load.com is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to protect form submissions, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a gap. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance risk under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. The domain registration status includes protective flags, enhancing domain security. Overall, the site is secure for basic operations but requires enhancements in policy transparency, security headers, and compliance documentation to reach higher maturity levels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information and security policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Protect your web assets with cutting-edge real-time obfuscation. Ensure your JavaScript, CSS, and HTML are secure from unauthorized access, while delivering seamless performance for your users.
Key services
Real-Time Obfuscation of JavaScript, CSS, HTML, Developer-Friendly API integration, Performance Optimized security, Customizable security rules
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, Cloudflare CDN, AWS, Google Cloud, CSS3, HTML5, Google Fonts
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and external scripts)
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a clear value proposition for web resource security via real-time obfuscation.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact is only via a web form with Google reCAPTCHA; no direct emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. Use of multi-CDN providers (Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud) indicates robust hosting and delivery infrastructure.
  5. No social media or external business contact links found.
  6. No explicit security headers or policies disclosed.
  7. Domain is very new, indicating a startup or new service launch.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection on its contact form. Hosting and content delivery are managed via a multi-CDN setup involving Cloudflare, AWS, and Google Cloud, indicating a robust and scalable infrastructure. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and user experience. However, no CMS or specific frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. Performance is likely fast due to CDN usage. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which should be addressed to improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 84302764.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 84302764.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.