Skip to main content

Security report for zzpulsz.hr

Zavod za prostorno uređenje Ličko-senjske županije · Government · Croatia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zavod za prostorno uređenje Ličko-senjske županije is a Croatian government agency established in 2008, responsible for coordinating, monitoring, and implementing spatial planning within the Ličko-senjska county. The website serves as an official portal providing information about spatial plans, reports, and institutional activities targeting local residents, government officials, and urban planning professionals. The business model is focused on public sector service delivery with a clear mandate and regional authority. Technically, the website employs a modern but straightforward technology stack including jQuery, Modernizr, and Owl Carousel, hosted on a CMS platform developed by VIT. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible with multiple user-friendly features such as font resizing and contrast modes, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. SEO and metadata are well handled, though no structured JSON-LD data was found. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and basic security best practices like form validation and cookie consent. However, it lacks advanced security headers and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and serves its government function well. The main risks relate to missing privacy and security policy documentation and absence of explicit incident response information. Addressing these gaps would improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zzpulsz.hr

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institute holds a strong market position as the official spatial planning authority for Ličko-senjska županija, serving government and local stakeholders. Its competitive advantage lies in its official mandate and comprehensive spatial planning services including coordination, reporting, and advisory roles. Revenue streams are likely government-funded. The target customers are local government units, planners, and citizens interested in spatial development. The partnership with VIT for web services indicates a stable technology ecosystem. Growth indicators include digitalization efforts such as new digital services for transparent planning. Strategic observations suggest maintaining transparency and expanding digital services could enhance public engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. The absence of security headers and incident response contacts indicates room for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed data were found, suggesting a low immediate risk. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing privacy policy documentation. Incident response readiness is unclear. The security culture appears basic but functional. Enhancing security policies, publishing incident response contacts, and adding security headers would strengthen the posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Continue enhancing accessibility and mobile optimization to maintain high user experience standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Zavod za prostorno uređenje Ličko-senjske županije
Registration number
02444739
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zavod za prostorno uređenje Ličko-senjske županije
Description
Osnutkom Zavoda za prostorno uređenje Ličko-senjske županije dana 28.03.2008. godine, započeo je njegov rad s jasnim ciljem: koordinacija, praćenje i provedba prostornih planova na području županije.
Key services
Coordination of spatial plan creation and implementation, Preparation of spatial planning reports, Management of spatial planning information systems, Providing expert advisory services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Modernizr, Owl Carousel, Google Fonts (Montserrat)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form validation on required fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Croatian government spatial planning institute site.
  2. Content is comprehensive about spatial planning activities in Ličko-senjska županija.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with clear user options.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. Uses a custom CMS by VIT.
  9. Good accessibility features including font resizing, dyslexia mode, contrast options.
  10. No analytics scripts detected or active without consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS by VIT and relies on established JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Modernizr. It includes Google Fonts for typography and Owl Carousel for UI components. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as font resizing and contrast modes. Performance is moderate with no obvious technical debt but could benefit from optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, though no structured data (JSON-LD) was found. Hosting details are not explicit but no issues detected. Technical risks are low but adding security headers and modernizing some scripts could improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zzpulsz.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zzpulsz.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.