Skip to main content

Security report for zvizgavka.si

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain zvizgavka.si is newly registered in June 2023 with OVH as the registrar. The website is currently not set up and only displays a minimal placeholder page stating "zvizgavka.si is not set up." There is no business information, metadata, or content available to analyze. The technical infrastructure is minimal with no detected CMS, frameworks, or scripts. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS and security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact information is provided, limiting trust and credibility. Overall, the site appears to be in an initial stage of deployment or abandoned before launch. From a technical perspective, the site is hosted with OVH but lacks any modern web technologies or optimizations. There is no evidence of analytics, advertising, or tracking mechanisms. The absence of security best practices such as HTTPS and security headers poses risks if the site were to go live without improvements. Security evaluation highlights critical gaps including no SSL, no security headers, and no privacy compliance. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate but the lack of content and policies results in a low trust score. There are no signs of malicious activity or blocking mechanisms. The overall risk is low in terms of maliciousness but high in terms of business credibility and security readiness. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, developing content and policies, adding contact information, and deploying security headers to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zvizgavka.si

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of any business content or metadata, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain is newly registered and currently inactive. There are no indications of market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of contact or company information suggests the site is either under development or abandoned.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal and immature. The site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit business insights. Overall, the site is not ready for production use from a security perspective.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate immediately to secure communications.
  2. Develop and publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  3. Add clear contact information including email and phone to improve business credibility.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Create meaningful website content and metadata to improve SEO, user experience, and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a placeholder with minimal HTML content indicating it is not set up.
  2. No metadata, no SEO tags, no structured data, no forms, no external links, no contact information.
  3. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  4. WHOIS data shows recent registration with OVH and domain status client_delete_prohibited.
  5. No business or branding information present on the site.
  6. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. No social media or contact emails or phone numbers found.
  9. Content safety is rated safe due to lack of content.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently consists of a single minimal HTML page with no metadata, scripts, or stylesheets. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Hosting is provided by OVH as per WHOIS data. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The domain uses OVH name servers. No security headers or HTTPS information is available. The site is not optimized for SEO or accessibility. Technical debt is high as the site is essentially a placeholder with no functional infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zvizgavka.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zvizgavka.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.