Skip to main content

Security report for zuzeum.com

Zuzeum · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zuzeum is a Latvian art center dedicated to housing the Zuzāns collection, recognized as the world's most significant private Latvian art collection. The website serves as a cultural portal offering information about exhibitions, events, and ticketing services, targeting art enthusiasts and cultural visitors both locally and internationally. The business model revolves around cultural engagement and ticketed access to exhibitions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js, along with integrations like Pretix for ticketing and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and technical modernization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes standard tracking scripts but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, supporting user data protection. Overall, Zuzeum presents a professional and trustworthy online presence for a cultural institution, but improvements in domain registration transparency, security headers, and direct contact information would enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zuzeum.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
58
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zuzeum occupies a leading position in Latvia's cultural sector as the home of a major private art collection. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique collection and cultural significance. The business model focuses on cultural events and exhibitions with revenue streams from ticket sales. The target audience includes art lovers, tourists, and the Latvian public interested in contemporary art. Growth indicators include digital ticketing integration and active event promotion. The partnership ecosystem includes ticketing providers like Pretix and analytics via Google services. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing digital trust and expanding international outreach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable gap, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and improving domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zuzeum
Description
Zuzeum is an art center housing the Zuzāns collection, the world's most significant private Latvian art collection.
Key services
Art exhibitions, Cultural events, Ticket sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Pretix ticketing widget, Vue.js (implied by vue3-marquee class), Swiper.js, Fancybox
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure external scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates ticketing via Pretix.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact is via form.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No adult or NSFW content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern front-end using Vue.js components, Swiper.js for sliders, and Fancybox for media display. It integrates Pretix for ticket sales, indicating a mature e-commerce capability for cultural events. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking and marketing analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses custom fonts loaded from its own API domain. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load times and accessibility compliance. No major technical debt is evident, but security enhancements and domain registration verification are advised to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zuzeum.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zuzeum.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.