Skip to main content

Security report for zurmuehlengruppe.de

zur Mühlen Gruppe · Manufacturing · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The zur Mühlen Gruppe is a large German manufacturing company specializing in the production and distribution of meat and sausage products. With approximately 4,000 employees across 12 locations, the company produces over 2 billion consumer packages annually and holds multiple prestigious awards such as 'Marke des Jahrhunderts' and 'Top Marke 2020'. Their business model focuses on high-quality food production, supported by rigorous quality assurance processes including 50,000 laboratory tests annually. The company also operates internationally through its subsidiary zur Mühlen International (ZMI), marketing products in over 40 countries. Technically, the website is built on the TYPO3 CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive content. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, clear navigation, and professional design, although some accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. However, there is no visible cookie consent mechanism, and security headers are not explicitly present in the provided data. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS as indicated by canonical URLs, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. No forms or contact emails are visible on the main page, limiting direct user communication channels. There is no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing standard security headers, cookie consent, and incident response contacts. The overall risk assessment is low to moderate. The site is legitimate, professionally maintained, and focused on a well-established business sector. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance with cookie consent, adding security headers, publishing incident response policies, and improving contact information visibility to strengthen trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zurmuehlengruppe.de

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

zur Mühlen Gruppe holds a strong market position in the German and international meat manufacturing sector. Their competitive advantages include a large-scale production capacity, multiple award-winning brands, and a comprehensive quality assurance system. The business model centers on manufacturing and exporting high-quality meat products, targeting both retail consumers and business clients. Growth indicators include international expansion through subsidiaries and export offices. The company maintains a consistent branding strategy and leverages its reputation for quality and responsibility. Partnerships and subsidiaries like zur Mühlen International and Könecke Polska support their global reach and operational efficiency.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and incident response contact information indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and NIS2 directives. Data protection officer contact details and vulnerability disclosure policies are not present, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The security culture could be enhanced by publishing clear policies and implementing technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish incident response and security policy pages with clear contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Include visible and verified contact information on the website to improve user trust and communication.
  5. Establish a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure and encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
zur Mühlen Gruppe
Description
Die zur Mühlen Gruppe ist ein Hersteller von Fleisch- und Wurstwaren mit 4.000 Mitarbeitern an 12 Standorten, produziert jährlich über 2 Milliarden Verbraucherpackungen und bietet preisgekrönte Qualitätsprodukte in verschiedenen Kategorien und Darreichungsformen.
Key services
Fleisch- und Wurstwarenproduktion, Qualitätssicherung, Export und internationales Marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 3.1.1, Swiper.js
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German language.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  4. No visible forms for contact or data collection on main page.
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  6. Security headers and SSL configuration details not provided; assumed HTTPS due to canonical link.
  7. Uses TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries.
  8. Strong branding and multiple awards cited.
  9. International presence via subsidiary and export company.
  10. No social media links detected in provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. The use of modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.1.1 and Swiper.js supports interactive and responsive user experiences. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and clear navigation structures. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility features and SEO optimization. The hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not explicitly provided, which could be further investigated to assess infrastructure security and reliability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zurmuehlengruppe.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zurmuehlengruppe.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.