Skip to main content

Security report for zudc.lt

VĮ Žemės ūkio duomenų centras · Government · Lithuania

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VĮ Žemės ūkio duomenų centras is a Lithuanian government entity focused on leveraging data-driven insights to enable sustainable agriculture. The website serves as an official platform providing information and resources related to agricultural data analysis. The organization positions itself as a national data center supporting agricultural stakeholders with relevant data services. The site is primarily in Lithuanian with English language support, reflecting its target audience within Lithuania's agricultural sector and government bodies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Yoast SEO plugin and Bootstrap framework, indicating a modern but standard CMS-based infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no significant issues detected in the content delivery. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies such as privacy or cookie policies. No contact information for security or incident response is provided, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is average with room for improvement in compliance and transparency. The overall risk assessment suggests the site is legitimate and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance, and clearer contact channels to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zudc.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a government data center specializing in agricultural data to promote sustainable farming practices in Lithuania. Its market position is that of a national authority providing essential data services to agricultural stakeholders. The business model revolves around public sector data provision rather than commercial revenue generation. The target customers include government agencies, farmers, researchers, and policy makers. The presence of official branding and a Facebook page supports its credibility. However, the lack of detailed business information and contact details limits deeper business intelligence insights. The site does not appear to engage in advertising or affiliate marketing, focusing solely on informational and service delivery functions.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, but the absence of security policies and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site does not provide a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with opportunities to enhance transparency and protection measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information for security incidents and designate an incident response channel.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file to foster trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VĮ Žemės ūkio duomenų centras
Description
Mūsų tikslas panaudoti duomenimis pagrįstas įžvalgas, kad būtų galima įgalinti tvarų žemės ūkį.
Key services
Data analysis, Agricultural data insights, Sustainable agriculture enablement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Bootstrap 4, Google Fonts (Space Grotesk)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government data center for agriculture in Lithuania
  2. Content is in Lithuanian with English alternate language links
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in content
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and uses the Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. Google Fonts (Space Grotesk) is used for typography. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML structure or CSS. However, the absence of advanced security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and regulatory adherence. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance to improve user experience and inclusivity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zudc.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zudc.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.