Skip to main content

Security report for zuc-kzz.hr

Županijska uprava za ceste Krapinsko-Zagorske županije · Government · Croatia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Županijska uprava za ceste Krapinsko-Zagorske županije is a Croatian government agency responsible for managing county roads within the Krapinsko-Zagorska region. The website serves as an official platform providing information on road maintenance, closures, public procurement, financial plans, and legal documentation. It targets local residents, businesses, and stakeholders involved in regional infrastructure. The business model is that of a public sector entity focused on infrastructure management and transparency. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder, Contact Form 7, and Slider Revolution. It uses modern web technologies including HTTPS, Google Fonts, and jQuery. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with good SEO practices. However, some improvements can be made in security headers and analytics configuration. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses CAPTCHA for forms, but lacks explicit security headers and a formal security policy or incident response contact. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is indicated by a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR adherence, though cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, reflecting its government entity status. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, enhancing security headers, properly configuring analytics, and publishing security and incident response information to improve compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zuc-kzz.hr

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency holds a strong regional position as the official authority for road management in Krapinsko-Zagorska County. Its competitive advantage lies in its government mandate and transparent public procurement processes. Revenue streams are primarily government-funded. The target customers are local citizens, contractors, and government bodies. Growth indicators include regular updates on road projects and public notices. The partnership ecosystem is limited to government and public sector collaborations. Operationally, the agency maintains a medium-sized digital presence with consistent branding and content quality.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and CAPTCHA is used to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness. No known vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were found. Compliance with GDPR is evident but could be strengthened with cookie consent and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government informational site but can be improved.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Properly configure or remove unused Google Analytics plugins to avoid unnecessary data collection.
  4. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Županijska uprava za ceste Krapinsko-Zagorske županije
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Županijska uprava za ceste Krapinsko-Zagorske županije
Description
Županijska uprava za ceste Krapinsko-zagorske županije is a government entity responsible for managing county roads in the Krapinsko-Zagorska region of Croatia. It provides information on road closures, public procurement, financial plans, reports, and legal acts related to road management.
Key services
Road maintenance and management, Public procurement and contract management, Information dissemination on road conditions and closures, Financial and operational reporting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, LayerSlider, WPBakery Page Builder, Contact Form 7, Photo Gallery plugin, Slider Revolution, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CAPTCHA (Google reCAPTCHA script loaded)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Croatian government entity site for regional road management.
  2. Content is comprehensive and regularly updated with news and official documents.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. Uses standard WordPress plugins and themes with moderate customization.
  5. Lacks explicit cookie consent mechanism despite GDPR compliance in privacy policy.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  7. No explicit incident response or security contact emails found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS platform with popular plugins for content management, galleries, and sliders. The tech stack includes PHP, jQuery, and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider elements. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with an accessibility toolbar present. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins and missing security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicit, which could be further investigated for infrastructure security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zuc-kzz.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zuc-kzz.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.