Skip to main content

Security report for zrece.si

Občina Zreče · Government · Slovenia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Občina Zreče operates a comprehensive municipal website serving the local community in Slovenia. The site provides a broad range of public services including electronic application submissions, online fee payments, local news, event calendars, and project information. The website targets residents and stakeholders of the Zreče municipality, positioning itself as a key digital gateway for local government services. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, with responsive design and accessibility features, indicating a moderate to good level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, though it lacks published privacy and cookie policies as well as security headers, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, reflecting the municipality's commitment to digital public service delivery.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zrece.si

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website reflects a local government business model focused on public service delivery and community engagement. Its market position is that of an essential municipal authority portal, providing transparency and access to administrative processes. Revenue streams are typical for government entities, primarily funded by public budgets. The target audience includes local residents, businesses, and visitors. The site integrates with partner platforms such as e-obcina.si for e-government services and lex-localis.info for legal information, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include active news updates, project disclosures, and public tenders. Strategic observations suggest the municipality values digital communication but could enhance trust and compliance by adding privacy and security policies.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. There are no visible signs of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data. Compliance gaps include missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR. The security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in formalizing security practices and user trust mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add incident response contact information, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Občina Zreče
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Občina Zreče
Description
Občina Zreče. Poslujte elektronsko z občino: oddajte e-vlogo, plačajte takso preko spleta in prejmite odločbo na domač naslov, naročite se na obveščanje občine, preverite lokalne novice, dogodke in še veliko več.
Key services
Electronic submission of applications, Online payment of fees, Municipal news and announcements, Event calendar, Local projects and investments information, Contact information, Public tenders and calls, Local heritage and culture information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, TinyMCE, Moment.js, Structured Data JSON-LD
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of modern JS libraries
  • Warning for outdated IE browsers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Slovenian municipal government portal for Občina Zreče.
  2. Content is comprehensive with news, events, projects, tenders, and contact info.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and responsive design.
  5. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided snippet.
  8. Contact info is clearly presented and consistent.
  9. External links mostly to official or related government and local service domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom or proprietary CMS platform (e-občina.si) using standard web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and TinyMCE. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with some use of carousels and image sliders that may impact load times. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and contact information. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious approach or limited digital marketing focus. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing formal privacy and cookie management mechanisms, which could affect compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zrece.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zrece.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.