Skip to main content

Security report for zorgkantoorfriesland.nl

Zorgkantoor Friesland · Healthcare · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zorgkantoor Friesland is a regional healthcare office responsible for the execution of the Long-term Care Act (Wlz) in Friesland, Netherlands. The website provides comprehensive information and services related to long-term care, including personal budgets (PGB), care provider directories, and support for consumers. It targets residents of Friesland who require long-term care assistance. The business operates as a public regional authority with a clear focus on healthcare services within its jurisdiction. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Vue.js, integrates Coveo for search functionality, and uses Relay42 for tag management and marketing. The CMS appears to be Sitecore. However, the site suffers from slow load times and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which significantly impacts its security posture. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, and SEO practices are well implemented. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers is a critical vulnerability. DNS security features like DNSSEC and CAA records are not configured. No explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear compliant with GDPR requirements. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent security improvements, especially SSL implementation, to protect user data and improve trust. Performance optimization is also recommended to enhance user experience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of zorgkantoorfriesland.nl. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zorgkantoorfriesland.nl

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zorgkantoor Friesland holds a key position as the regional executor of the Wlz in Friesland, serving a defined geographic and demographic market. Its business model is government-backed, focusing on regulatory compliance and service delivery rather than commercial revenue. The website supports this with detailed service descriptions, consumer guidance, and links to official resources like the Zorgatlas. The presence of a PGB portal indicates digital service adoption. The organization maintains partnerships with government and healthcare entities but does not display commercial partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are not explicit but the site reflects ongoing regulatory changes and service updates. The company targets consumers needing long-term care, budget holders, and care providers. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status and regional exclusivity. The website supports transparency and accessibility, which are critical in public sector healthcare services.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate, which exposes users to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The absence of security headers and DNS security features further weakens the defense-in-depth strategy. No dedicated security or incident response information is available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. However, no known vulnerabilities or malware indicators are present in the content. Privacy compliance is adequate with GDPR-aligned policies. The site should prioritize SSL deployment, implement security headers, and consider DNSSEC and CAA to enhance trust and security. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible, suggesting potential gaps in organizational security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to control certificate issuance and improve DNS security.
  4. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
  5. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to enhance transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including jQuery, Vue.js, and Coveo search integrated with Sitecore CMS. Relay42 is used for tag management and marketing automation. Despite modern technologies, the site suffers from slow loading times (approx. 22 seconds) and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical technical deficiency. The absence of DNS A and AAAA records in the DNS data is unusual and may indicate DNS configuration issues or use of alternative DNS setups. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed. SEO metadata and Open Graph tags are properly implemented, supporting good search engine visibility. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zorgkantoorfriesland.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zorgkantoorfriesland.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.