Skip to main content

Security report for raads-rtest.online

RAADS-R Test · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RAADS-R Test Online is a specialized educational website offering a free 80-item autism screening tool designed for adults. The platform provides instant scoring with detailed domain breakdowns and emphasizes privacy by storing answers locally and providing private result links without requiring accounts or emails. The website positions itself as an educational resource rather than a diagnostic tool, targeting adults seeking to understand autism-related traits. The business model appears to be based on free access with potential optional paid features, focusing on niche healthcare screening. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, delivering fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible content. However, the WHOIS data reveals inconsistencies, notably a domain creation date set in the future, which raises questions about registration legitimacy. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced DNS security measures like DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is basic with policies present but no explicit GDPR consent mechanisms. Contact information is limited to a support email, with no phone or physical address provided.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raads-rtest.online

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention raads-rtest.online, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for raads-rtest.online right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The RAADS-R Test website occupies a niche in the healthcare sector, providing an online autism screening tool for adults. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a free, private, and educational screening experience with instant results and domain-specific insights. The target audience includes adults interested in autism traits and professionals seeking a reference tool. The platform's growth potential depends on expanding awareness and possibly integrating paid detailed reports or professional consultation services. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with no evident external business partners or subsidiaries. The website maintains editorial transparency by linking to original research studies and clarifying the non-diagnostic nature of the test.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain status flags preventing unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security indicates room for improvement. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The lack of tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits analytics capabilities. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could enhance trust and compliance by adopting additional security best practices and explicit data protection measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish explicit security policy and incident response pages to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and correct WHOIS inconsistencies to improve legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RAADS-R Test
Description
A private adult autism-trait screening reference with careful scoring context. Educational only; not a diagnosis or medical advice.
Key services
80-item RAADS-R autism screening test, Instant scoring with domain breakdowns, Private result links without account, Educational AI-generated reports
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML, Cloudflare DNS
Platforms
Web Browser
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional, well-designed educational tool for adult autism screening.
  2. No signs of malicious content or adult material.
  3. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
  4. WHOIS data shows inconsistent domain creation date in the future, which is suspicious.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response pages found.
  6. No tracking or advertising scripts detected.
  7. Contact information limited to a support email in footer.
  8. Privacy and cookie policies exist but lack explicit GDPR compliance indicators.
  9. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  10. No social media links detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, likely a JavaScript framework such as React or similar, indicated by modulepreload and JS asset patterns. It is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, ensuring fast content delivery and protection against common attacks. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and structured JSON-LD data. No CMS or backend platform was detected, suggesting a static or serverless architecture. Performance is fast with no blocking scripts or heavy resources detected. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to improve overall security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raads-rtest.online. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raads-rtest.online.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.