Skip to main content

Security report for zorgkantoorfriesland.nl

Zorgkantoor Friesland · Healthcare · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and DNS health.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zorgkantoor Friesland is a regional healthcare office responsible for the execution of the Long-term Care Act (Wlz) in Friesland, Netherlands. The organization provides long-term care advice, manages personal budgets (PGB), and coordinates care providers for consumers in the Friesland region. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and targets consumers seeking long-term care services. It uses modern technologies including Sitecore CMS, Vue.js, and Coveo search integration, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, performance metrics are missing and inferred to be slow, suggesting room for optimization. Security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support, which is a critical vulnerability for a healthcare-related site. Privacy policies and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no explicit consent mechanism is detected. Contact information is clear with a phone number and contact form available, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is trustworthy but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and comply with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: fallback.upcbusiness.nl

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zorgkantoorfriesland.nl

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zorgkantoor Friesland operates as a public regional healthcare entity, providing mandated long-term care services under Dutch law. Its market position is that of a regional authority within Friesland, serving consumers, budget holders, and care providers. The business model focuses on facilitating care arrangements, managing personal budgets, and providing information and support. The website reflects a mature digital presence with integration of advanced search and analytics tools, indicating a commitment to user experience and data-driven insights. Partnerships with related healthcare insurers and organizations are evident through linked domains. The absence of explicit business registration details on the site is typical for public entities but could be improved for transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with the presence of multiple security headers and a comprehensive content security policy. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of TLS protocol support are critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which limits transparency on security governance. The use of secure cookies and HttpOnly flags is a positive practice. The site employs multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, which increases the attack surface and requires careful management of data privacy and security. Overall, the security posture is weakened by fundamental SSL/TLS misconfigurations that must be addressed immediately.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and correctly install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect user data.
  2. Enable support for modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  3. Enhance HSTS policy by including subdomains and enabling preload to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  6. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to enhance user privacy and reduce risk.
  7. Add explicit cookie consent mechanisms to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  8. Consider publishing data protection officer contact details to improve transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Sitecore CMS with integration of modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and jQuery 3.5.1. It uses Coveo for advanced search capabilities and multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Usabilla, Mopinion, and Relay42. The hosting environment appears to be Microsoft Azure with use of Cloudfront CDN. Despite modern technologies, the site suffers from missing SSL/TLS configuration, which is a critical technical debt. Performance data is missing but inferred slow, indicating potential optimization needs. Accessibility and SEO are well addressed with proper meta tags, ARIA labels, and responsive design. The technical stack is robust but requires urgent security upgrades and performance tuning to ensure reliability and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zorgkantoorfriesland.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zorgkantoorfriesland.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.