Skip to main content

Security report for zoosciencelibrary.org

Verband der Zoologischen Gärten (VdZ) e.V. · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Zoo Science Library is a specialized online platform documenting peer-reviewed scientific publications involving modern zoological gardens and aquaria. It serves as a knowledge transfer and networking tool for the zoological research community, supported by reputable organizations such as the Verband der Zoologischen Gärten (VdZ) e.V. and the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). The website is professionally designed, bilingual (German and English), and provides a searchable database of over 1400 publications from 2018 to 2022. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern frontend frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, and it uses Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some HTTP security headers are missing and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed query responses, which slightly reduces domain trust but is mitigated by the site's affiliations and content quality. Overall, the site is a credible, niche scientific resource with good technical and security standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zoosciencelibrary.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Zoo Science Library operates as a non-profit initiative focused on zoological scientific research documentation. Its market position is niche, targeting researchers, zoos, aquaria, and related scientific communities. The platform's key services include a publication database and submission interface, fostering scientific collaboration and knowledge dissemination. Partnerships with VdZ and EAZA enhance its credibility and reach. The business model relies on institutional support rather than commercial revenue streams. Growth potential lies in expanding publication coverage and enhancing digital services. The absence of direct contact details suggests a focus on institutional rather than individual user engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. The use of Matomo analytics aligns with privacy-conscious practices. The missing WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security documentation and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact information.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Verband der Zoologischen Gärten (VdZ) e.V.
Description
Die Zoo Science Library listet Veröffentlichungen aus internationalen, peer-reviewed Fachzeitschriften auf, die unter Beteiligung moderner Zoologischer Gärten und Aquarien entstanden sind. Die Datenbank dokumentiert wissenschaftliche Leistungen zoologischer Einrichtungen und fördert Wissenstransfer und Vernetzung. Die Initiative wird getragen vom Verband der Zoologischen Gärten (VdZ) e.V. und dem Europäischen Zoo- und Aquarienverband (EAZA) e.V.
Key services
Datenbank mit wissenschaftlichen Publikationen, Suchfunktion für Publikationen, Möglichkeit zur Veröffentlichungseinreichung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap, jQuery, Select2, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German with English alternate.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed query response, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. Site uses modern CMS TYPO3 and standard web technologies.
  8. Affiliations with recognized zoological associations enhance credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It uses Select2 for enhanced form controls and Matomo for analytics, indicating a modern and privacy-aware technology stack. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The absence of HTTP security headers is a technical gap. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation supports the site's functional and business goals effectively, with room for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zoosciencelibrary.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zoosciencelibrary.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.