Skip to main content

Security report for zoofiliahentai.com

Zoofilia Hentai · Other · Brazil

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zoofilia Hentai operates a niche adult content website focused on aggregating zoophilia pornography videos primarily targeting Portuguese-speaking audiences, likely in Brazil. The site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts, including video embedding and Font Awesome icons. The technical infrastructure is moderate with Cloudflare DNS and NameSilo registrar, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges. However, it lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, GDPR compliance indicators, and verified contact information, which negatively impacts its trustworthiness and compliance posture. Advertising and tracking are present but without transparent consent mechanisms. Overall, the website scores low on security, privacy, and business credibility due to the nature of content and missing compliance elements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zoofiliahentai.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a very specific adult niche market with free content aggregation, likely monetized through advertising networks such as Xtraffix and Google Analytics tracking. Its market position is limited to a small, specialized audience. The business model is simple content aggregation without original production. There is no evidence of a formal business entity or certifications. The site is relatively new, founded in 2023, and does not disclose company registration or VAT information. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with no identified partners or subsidiaries. Growth potential is limited by the niche and legal risks associated with the content type.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates immature security practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The site does not demonstrate GDPR or other data protection compliance. The presence of tracking scripts without consent mechanisms further weakens privacy protections. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web threats and lacks transparency in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC and add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels.
  5. Improve transparency of advertising and tracking with user consent mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zoofilia Hentai
Description
Website providing free access to zoophilia pornographic videos, aggregating content not produced by the site itself, targeting Portuguese-speaking audiences.
Key services
Aggregation and presentation of zoophilia pornographic videos, Categorized video browsing, Search functionality
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Video.js, Font Awesome, Cloudflare DNS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
xtraffix
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag)
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts and aggregates illegal zoophilia content which is illegal in many jurisdictions.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact only via a contact form; no emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and scripts.
  5. No advanced security headers or policies detected.
  6. Advertising and tracking present but no transparency or consent mechanisms.
  7. Domain registration is recent and consistent with site launch.
  8. No social media links except Twitter handle in JSON-LD.
  9. Content and branding are basic and low professionalism.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with standard plugins including video embed and Font Awesome. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Cloudflare. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO is enhanced by Rank Math plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD. Accessibility features are minimal. The site lacks advanced security configurations and modern frameworks beyond WordPress and jQuery. Technical debt is present in missing security best practices and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zoofiliahentai.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zoofiliahentai.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.