Skip to main content

Security report for zonercloud.com

ZONER, s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and GDPR outside view.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ZonerCloud, operated by ZONER, s.r.o., is a Slovakia-based cloud services provider specializing in high-performance virtual private servers (VPS), managed hosting, email hosting, cloud storage, and AI/GPU server rentals. The company positions itself as a market leader in VPS performance within its region, leveraging partnerships with VMware and Microsoft to deliver reliable and scalable cloud infrastructure solutions. Their offerings target businesses and developers seeking affordable, powerful, and flexible cloud computing resources with rapid deployment times and strong uptime guarantees. Technically, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure using modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and various UI/UX libraries. It integrates analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, alongside a live chat support system. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, features comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms, and employs HTTPS with a DigiCert SSL certificate, indicating a strong commitment to security and privacy. From a security perspective, while the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms with CSRF tokens, it lacks publicly available formal security policies or incident response disclosures. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS registrant data slightly reduces trust but is mitigated by the professional presentation and trust signals such as certifications and partner logos. Overall, ZonerCloud presents a trustworthy and professional cloud service platform with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic improvements in transparency around security policies and incident response, as well as WHOIS data availability, would further enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zonercloud.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
95
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ZonerCloud operates in the competitive cloud infrastructure market, focusing on VPS and managed hosting services with a strong emphasis on performance and reliability. Their business model revolves around providing scalable cloud resources with rapid provisioning and 99.99% uptime SLAs, appealing to SMEs and developers. The company leverages strategic partnerships with industry leaders like VMware and Microsoft, enhancing its market credibility and technical capabilities. The presence of AI/GPU server offerings indicates a forward-looking approach targeting emerging AI and machine learning workloads. Customer logos and testimonials suggest a solid client base, reinforcing market position. The company’s use of multiple languages and currency options indicates regional market targeting primarily in Slovakia and neighboring countries. Revenue streams likely include subscription-based cloud services and software licensing. Growth indicators include continuous technology upgrades and promotional campaigns.

Security posture

ZonerCloud demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforcement, DigiCert SSL certification, and secure form handling with CSRF tokens. The website includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness perception. No security headers were explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header security. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but is managed with user consent. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and proactive security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and disclose an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process.
  3. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Enhance WHOIS data transparency or provide justification for privacy protection.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update cookie consent to reflect any changes.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ZONER, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ZONER, s.r.o.
Description
Cloud services on the VMware and Hyper-V platforms. VPS virtual server, Managed multihosting, web storage, e-mail hosting and SMTP servers.
Key services
Cloud Server VPS Linux, Cloud Server VPS Windows, Cloud Server Managed Linux, Cloud Server Managed Windows, Cloud Mail, Cloud Disk, AI/GPU Server Rental
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Ion RangeSlider, Slick Carousel, AOS (Animate on Scroll), Lightbox2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Live Help Chat (inetchat.zoner.com)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
VMware vSphere, Microsoft Hyper-V
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of DigiCert SSL certificate
  • Cookie consent modal with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong branding and consistent design with clear navigation.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls.
  4. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, live chat, and contact form.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but not critical given other trust signals.
  8. Website targets business customers for cloud VPS and AI/GPU services.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and various UI libraries for enhanced user experience. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, alongside a live chat system hosted on a subdomain. The site is mobile-optimized with fast loading times and clear navigation. The use of VMware and Microsoft Hyper-V platforms for cloud services indicates robust backend infrastructure. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is rated fast with excellent mobile optimization and good accessibility. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zonercloud.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zonercloud.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.