Skip to main content

Security report for zone.lt

Zone Media OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zone Media OÜ operates the website zone.lt (redirects to zone.eu) providing domain registration, web hosting, and cloud services primarily targeting European businesses. The company positions itself as a reliable and experienced provider with 25 years of hosting experience and a mature domain. Their offerings include domain registration across a broad range of TLDs, managed cloud servers, WordPress hosting, and AI-assisted website creation tools. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, mobile optimization, and SEO best practices implemented. Technically, the site uses WordPress CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and plugins, delivering moderate performance and good accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, SPF, and DMARC policies in place, though improvements like enabling HSTS, DNSSEC, and OCSP stapling are recommended. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, with consent mechanisms active. The domain registration data is consistent with the business identity, showing no suspicious patterns aside from missing domain locks. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and well-positioned in the European hosting market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zone.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zone.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
18
Employees
0
Customers
18
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
22%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for zone.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zone Media OÜ targets the European SME and professional market with a comprehensive portfolio of domain and hosting services. Their business model combines domain registration with hosting and cloud infrastructure, supplemented by website creation tools and partner programs. The company leverages partnerships with major data center providers like Equinix and Telia to ensure reliable infrastructure. Their market position is strengthened by a mature domain, positive customer reviews, and a clear value proposition emphasizing ease of use, security, and performance. The presence of affiliate and partner programs indicates a strategic approach to growth and ecosystem development. The company’s digital maturity is reflected in their use of modern web technologies and compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced using TLS 1.3 and 1.2, valid SPF and DMARC records with a reject policy, and no known SSL vulnerabilities detected. However, the absence of HSTS, DNSSEC, CAA records, and OCSP stapling indicates areas for improvement to enhance DNS and transport security. No subdomain takeover vulnerabilities were found. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Incident response and security policy documents are not explicitly found on the site, which could be enhanced. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from implementing additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add CAA DNS records to restrict certificate issuance to authorized CAs.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking performance and privacy.
  5. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and preparedness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO, and custom plugins like Zone domain handler. The site is hosted likely on infrastructure partnered with Equinix and Telia, ensuring reliable data center presence in Europe. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 8.7 seconds and 53 resources loaded. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. There is room for performance optimization to reduce load times. The technical implementation is robust with no critical errors detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zone.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zone.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.