Skip to main content

Security report for zologie.com

Pieter Rubberecht · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website piru.be is a personal portfolio for Pieter Rubberecht, showcasing a variety of creative projects including board game design, illustration, infographics, branding, and video production. The site targets creative professionals and potential clients interested in visual and design services. It operates as a digital portfolio hosted on Adobe Portfolio, leveraging modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Typekit fonts. The website is well-structured with good design quality and mobile optimization, providing a positive user experience. However, it lacks essential compliance and security features such as privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers. HTTPS is enabled, but no advanced security configurations are detected. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy but could improve in privacy compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zologie.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pieter Rubberecht operates as an independent creative professional with a focus on visual arts and design. The portfolio highlights diverse projects, indicating a broad skill set and a freelance business model. The domain age of over 17 years supports a stable online presence. The absence of contact details and social media links may limit direct client engagement. The site does not appear to monetize through advertising or affiliate programs, focusing instead on showcasing work. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with no related or partner domains identified. Growth potential could be enhanced by adding contact channels and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms or data collection points reduce the attack surface, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site does not use analytics or tracking scripts, minimizing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for improvement in compliance and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information, including email and social media links, to facilitate client communication and incident reporting.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and platform updates to maintain security and performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pieter Rubberecht
Description
Portfolio website showcasing the creative works and projects of Pieter Rubberecht, including board game design, illustrations, infographics, branding, and video production.
Key services
Board game design, Illustration, Infographics, Branding, Video production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Adobe Portfolio, Typekit Fonts
Platforms
Adobe Portfolio
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio for a creative professional.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
  4. Uses Adobe Portfolio platform and Typekit fonts.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  10. WHOIS data indicates a long-established domain with consistent registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Portfolio, a platform optimized for creative portfolios, using modern web standards and Typekit fonts for typography. The site loads multiple optimized images with responsive srcset attributes, indicating attention to performance and mobile responsiveness. However, no advanced frameworks or CMS beyond Adobe Portfolio are detected. The site lacks analytics and tracking tools, which may limit marketing insights but enhances privacy. Performance is moderate, with no evident broken elements or errors. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO optimization is minimal, relying mainly on meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting is via Adobe's CDN, providing reliable uptime and delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zologie.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zologie.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.