Skip to main content

Security report for zohopublic.eu

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

66/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at zohopublic.eu is currently inaccessible, presenting only a JSON error message indicating an authentication error (HTTP 401). This suggests that the site content is restricted and requires authentication to access. Due to this limitation, no meaningful business, technical, or security content is available for analysis. The domain is registered through CSC CORPORATE DOMAINS INC., a reputable registrar, but no further registrant details are provided to verify legitimacy or business claims. The lack of accessible content prevents evaluation of privacy policies, contact information, or security posture. Overall, the site appears to be protected or restricted, limiting external visibility and analysis.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of zohopublic.eu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zohopublic.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
66

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zohopublic.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
37
Employees
0
Customers
37
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
24%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for zohopublic.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence can be derived from the current accessible data. The absence of visible content, metadata, or structured data means no insights into market positioning, services, or business model are available. The domain registration through a corporate registrar suggests a professional entity, but without further data, no conclusions can be drawn.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of accessible content and headers. The presence of an authentication error indicates some access control is in place, which is a positive security measure. However, no information on HTTPS, security headers, or incident response policies is available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is unknown but likely minimal from a public perspective.

Recommendations

  1. Ensure public-facing pages provide at least basic information or landing content to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and expose standard security headers and HTTPS to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact and incident response information to facilitate communication and compliance.
  5. Review access control settings to balance security with necessary public visibility for business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website content is blocked or inaccessible, showing a JSON error with status 401 authentication_error, indicating restricted access or authentication required. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to authentication error (401).
  2. No metadata, structured data, or visible content beyond error JSON.
  3. No forms, contact info, or external links detected in provided HTML.
  4. No scripts or technology indicators found in the minimal HTML.
  5. WHOIS data is minimal, only registrar name available.
  6. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  7. No security headers or SSL configuration data available.
  8. Website appears to be protected or restricted, limiting analysis.
  9. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
  10. Analysis incomplete due to blocked content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website's technical implementation cannot be evaluated due to the minimal HTML content showing only a JSON error message. No metadata, scripts, or technology indicators are present. The domain is registered with a known registrar, but hosting provider and CMS details are unknown. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed. The site likely uses access control mechanisms that block unauthenticated access, but no WAF vendor or security technology is explicitly identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium26 findings · partial scanView report
  2. 66/100Medium26 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zohopublic.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zohopublic.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.