Skip to main content

Security report for zogiem.lv

PROECO LV SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ŽOGIEM.LV is a Latvian small business specializing in manufacturing and installation of metal fences, gates, and automation solutions for private and industrial clients. The company operates an e-commerce platform powered by WooCommerce, offering a range of fencing products and related services. Their market position is focused on local Latvian customers including private individuals, construction companies, and developers. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, with active social media presence and standard privacy and cookie compliance features. Technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and integration with marketing tools like Google Analytics and Mailchimp. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the site shows no suspicious indicators and appears legitimate. Overall, the business demonstrates a solid digital presence with room for enhanced security policies and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zogiem.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a niche market in fencing and gate manufacturing with a combined product and service business model. Revenue streams likely include direct product sales via the online shop and installation services. The client base spans private homeowners to industrial clients, indicating a diversified customer segment. The partnership with miraltek.lv for digital marketing suggests a focus on professional online presence and growth. The business is relatively young (founded 2018) but shows consistent branding and content quality. No subsidiaries or parent companies are identified. The company leverages social media and SEO to maintain market visibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and standard security practices such as cookie consent and privacy policy disclosures, indicating awareness of GDPR compliance. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of popular CMS and plugins requires regular updates to mitigate risks. Security headers are partially implemented or not detectable, suggesting an area for enhancement. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels for reporting issues.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider DNSSEC deployment to improve domain security.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training for staff.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PROECO LV SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PROECO LV SIA
Description
Uzņēmums nodarbojas ar kvalitatīvu metāla žogu konstrukciju izgatavošanu un uzstādīšanu privātiem un industriāliem objektiem. Piedāvā vārtus, žogus un automatizācijas risinājumus, kā arī konsultācijas un montāžu. Klientu lokā ir privātpersonas, uzņēmumi, būvkompānijas un attīstītāji.
Key services
žogu izgatavošana, vārtu izgatavošana, automatizācijas risinājumi, montāža, konsultācijas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, WooCommerce 10.0.4, Elementor 3.30.4, Yoast SEO 25.6, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Mailchimp for WooCommerce
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats (WordPress.com), Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Mailchimp for WooCommerce, Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site selling fencing and gate products.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local Latvian customers.
  3. Clear contact information with phone, email, and physical address provided.
  4. Privacy policy, cookie consent, and terms of service pages are present.
  5. No signs of malware, phishing, or adult content.
  6. Modern frontend technologies and SEO plugins used.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  9. Active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  10. Cookie consent banner is implemented and visible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with WooCommerce 10.0.4 and Elementor 3.30.4, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. Integration with Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, and Mailchimp shows a mature marketing and analytics setup. Performance is moderate with caching and minification evident. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin. No critical technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for security and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zogiem.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zogiem.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.