Skip to main content

Security report for zoc.lv

SIA "ZEMGALES OLIMPISKAIS CENTRS" · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zemgales Olimpiskā Centra (ZOC) is a regional public sports and recreation center based in Jelgava, Latvia. The website serves as an information portal for local residents and sports enthusiasts, providing details on sports facilities, seasonal ice rink activities, fitness classes, and event hosting services. The site is positioned as a key community resource for sports and recreational activities in the region. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the GeneratePress theme and several plugins for event management, GDPR compliance, and user engagement. The infrastructure includes integration with Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for social media presence and visitor tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible HTTP security headers such as CSP or HSTS. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits full domain legitimacy verification, though the website content and contact information strongly indicate a legitimate public entity. Some suspicious hidden links in the footer widget area warrant further review. Overall, the site is functional, user-friendly, and compliant with GDPR requirements, serving its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zoc.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ZOC operates in the government sector, managing sports facilities and organizing local sports events. Its business model focuses on providing public sports infrastructure and hosting community events, targeting local residents and sports participants. The website reflects a medium-sized organization with a regional focus. The presence of official contact details, embedded maps, and social media integration supports its credibility. However, the presence of unrelated hidden links in the footer suggests possible SEO manipulation or unauthorized content injection, which should be addressed. The lack of terms of service and limited security policy information indicates room for improvement in transparency and governance. The organization appears to maintain a stable market position as a regional sports center with potential for growth through enhanced digital presence and security.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating awareness of privacy and security requirements. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content. The use of common WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate known vulnerabilities. The suspicious hidden links in the footer may indicate a security or content integrity issue that requires investigation. Incident response and security policy documentation are not found on the site, suggesting limited formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security headers and better content control.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Conduct a security audit of WordPress plugins and themes to ensure all components are up to date and free from known vulnerabilities.
  3. Investigate and remove suspicious hidden links in the footer to maintain content integrity and prevent SEO penalties.
  4. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO by improving meta tags, alt attributes, and mobile responsiveness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "ZEMGALES OLIMPISKAIS CENTRS"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "ZEMGALES OLIMPISKAIS CENTRS"
Description
Zemgales Olimpiskā Centra (ZOC) website provides information about sports facilities, events, and services in Jelgava, Latvia. It targets visitors interested in sports complexes, ice rinks, fitness activities, and local sports events.
Key services
Sports complex facilities, Ice rink seasonal activities, Fitness and aerobics classes, Event hosting and commercial space rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Slider Image plugin, Events Manager plugin, Contact Form 7, SiteOrigin Panels, GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin
Frameworks
GeneratePress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a public sports center site for Jelgava, Latvia
  2. Content is in Latvian with English translation option
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for events and GDPR compliance
  4. Contact info is clearly presented with physical address and official email
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  6. Footer contains suspicious hidden links unrelated to main business
  7. No terms of service page found
  8. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  9. No visible security headers in HTML content
  10. Site uses HTTPS and Google Analytics for tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the GeneratePress theme, leveraging plugins such as Events Manager, Contact Form 7, GDPR Cookie Compliance, and Slider Image. It uses jQuery and integrates with Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for analytics and social media features. The site loads external resources from trusted domains including Google Fonts and MaxCDN. Performance is moderate with a responsive design suitable for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen-reader text and skip links present. SEO optimization is basic with canonical tags and RSS feeds but could be enhanced. The site lacks visible advanced security headers and may benefit from performance optimizations and modern JavaScript frameworks for improved user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zoc.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zoc.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.