Statutární město Zlín · Government · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.
The website https://zlin.eu/ serves as the official online presence of the statutory city of Zlín in the Czech Republic. It provides comprehensive information about the city's administration, culture, events, public services, and citizen engagement platforms. The site targets residents, local businesses, and visitors, offering services such as an official citizen portal, public notices, event calendars, and contact information for municipal departments. The business model is that of a government entity providing transparent and accessible information and services to its constituents. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, OneSignal push notifications, and various UI libraries such as Slick Carousel and SweetAlert2. It is hosted by Media4web, s.r.o., a Czech hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented with high confidence in GDPR compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a Content Security Policy header and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. While no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, additional security headers could enhance protection. There is no explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information published, which could be improved to strengthen trust and readiness. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations. It effectively serves its role as a municipal information hub with a strong digital presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing clear incident response contacts to further improve security posture and stakeholder confidence.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention zlin.eu, from OffSeq Breach.
2 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for zlin.eu.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with zlin.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zlin.eu.