Skip to main content

Security report for zlatafirma.eu

Zlatá Firma · Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zlatá Firma is a Slovak business award platform recognizing top-rated companies based on customer reviews aggregated from reliable sources such as Google Maps and Facebook. The platform promotes these companies by listing them and allowing them to use the Zlatá Firma logo and marketing packages. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and content relevant to its target audience of Slovak businesses and customers. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, with HTTPS enforced ensuring secure communications. However, it lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for enhanced privacy compliance. The WHOIS data is privacy protected by EURid, which is typical for EU domains, and no suspicious patterns were detected, supporting the legitimacy of the domain. Overall, the site presents a moderate to good security posture with room for improvement in privacy and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zlatafirma.eu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche market of business awards and marketing promotion in Slovakia, leveraging customer feedback from trusted online platforms. Its business model centers on data aggregation, analysis, and awarding companies that meet high customer satisfaction thresholds. The platform targets Slovak companies seeking recognition and customers looking for reliable service providers. The presence of multiple regional partner domains indicates a broader Central European footprint. The company appears small in size but holds a consistent brand image and trust signals through customer reviews and clear award criteria. Revenue streams likely include marketing packages and promotional services for awarded companies. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a controlled communication channel primarily via forms.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, which is standard practice. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent banner or detailed cookie policy may present GDPR compliance gaps. No published security policy or incident response contacts reduce transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent mechanisms, and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness for security incidents.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerable or privacy-invasive components are used.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zlatá Firma
Description
Zlatá Firma je ocenenie pre najlepšie hodnotené spoločnosti na Slovensku. Podporuje firmy s najvyššou úrovňou služieb a propaguje ich na zozname. Firmy môžu používať logo Zlatá firma a získať marketingové balíčky.
Key services
Company rating aggregation, Awarding top-rated companies, Marketing and promotional support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy protection.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with no visible security issues.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage; contact is via form.
  5. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and linked.
  6. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  7. Website content is in Slovak language targeting Slovak businesses and customers.
  8. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking.
  9. Multiple partner country domains linked in footer navigation.
  10. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with deferred loading of scripts for performance optimization. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile responsive with adaptive background images and a clear navigation structure. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detectable. Performance is moderate with no obvious technical debt or errors in the HTML structure. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including Open Graph tags for social sharing. The lack of explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are technical gaps that should be addressed to improve security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zlatafirma.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zlatafirma.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.