Skip to main content

Security report for zivot.cz

Agentura Život spol. s r.o. · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agentura Život spol. s r.o. is a Czech security agency established in 1990, providing comprehensive physical security services including protection of persons, property, and event security. The company holds recognized certifications such as ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and OHSAS 18001, indicating a mature integrated management system. Their client base includes government entities and commercial organizations, positioning them as a trusted medium-sized security service provider in the Czech Republic. Technically, the website uses common web technologies like Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Analytics, but lacks HTTPS enforcement and modern security headers, which weakens its security posture. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to align with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zivot.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zivot.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for zivot.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses and private clients needing security services, leveraging long-term experience and certifications to differentiate itself. Its business model focuses on integrated security solutions combining physical presence and technology. The presence of government and large commercial clients suggests stable revenue streams and a solid market position. The website reflects consistent branding and trust signals such as insurance coverage and professional memberships. However, the lack of WHOIS data and missing privacy policies may impact perceived credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate with strengths in certified management systems and physical security expertise. However, the website reveals vulnerabilities such as lack of HTTPS, insecure external script loading, and absence of security headers. The contact form uses a simple math CAPTCHA but could benefit from stronger anti-bot measures. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency. GDPR compliance is not clearly addressed, and no data protection officer contact is found. These gaps pose risks for data protection and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS site-wide and ensure all external resources load over secure protocols.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Enhance contact form anti-spam measures with modern CAPTCHA solutions.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Agentura Život spol. s r.o.
Registration number
250 94 874
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agentura Život spol. s r.o.
Description
Bezpečnostní agentura Život poskytuje služby v oblasti bezpečnosti osob, majetku a objektů s dlouholetou praxí a zkušenostmi. Nabízí komplexní bezpečnostní služby včetně fyzické ostrahy, recepčních služeb a pořadatelských služeb.
Key services
Physical security of property and persons, Reception and information services, Event security, Security technology installation and monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Font Awesome, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Maps API, Lightbox, Venobox, TinyMCE
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of CAPTCHA in contact form (simple math question)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS scripts for analytics and maps

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leady.cz
Marketing tools
Leady.cz tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple sections describing company services.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact form includes basic anti-spam but no advanced CAPTCHA.
  4. External scripts loaded over HTTP may expose users to man-in-the-middle risks.
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  6. Company presents strong trust signals via certifications and client references.
  7. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected in provided data.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard tech stack with Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google APIs. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile optimization and accessibility. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static implementation. External tracking scripts are present, but some load over HTTP, which is a security risk. The site structure and navigation are clear and user-friendly. Technical debt includes missing HTTPS and security headers, which should be prioritized for remediation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zivot.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zivot.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.