Skip to main content

Security report for ziviltechniker.at

Bundeskammer der Ziviltechniker:innen · Government · Austria

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website for Bundeskammer der Ziviltechniker:innen serves as an official directory and information portal for certified civil engineers and architects in Austria. It provides comprehensive contact details for regional chambers and the federal chamber, supporting professionals and the public in accessing qualified experts. The site is government-affiliated and targets industry professionals and clients seeking certified services. Technically, the site is built on Angular 13, uses Google Maps API for location services, and Font Awesome for icons. The design is professional and mobile-optimized, though some accessibility and SEO features could be enhanced. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS presumably enabled but lacking visible security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained but could improve security and privacy features.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ziviltechniker.at. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ziviltechniker.at

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bundeskammer der Ziviltechniker:innen holds a strong market position as the official professional chamber for civil engineers and architects in Austria. Its business model focuses on regulatory and member services rather than commercial sales. The website supports this by providing a searchable directory and contact points for regional chambers. The organization benefits from government affiliation, enhancing trust and legitimacy. The partner ecosystem includes regional chambers with dedicated domains. The site’s content and structure indicate a medium-sized entity focused on professional services and regulatory compliance. Growth indicators are not explicit but the site’s comprehensive directory and regional presence suggest stable operations.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security headers, formal vulnerability disclosure policies, and improved privacy controls to strengthen its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and inform users about cookie usage.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bundeskammer der Ziviltechniker:innen
Description
Staatlich befugte und beeidete Ziviltechniker:innen sind natürliche Personen, die freiberuflich aufgrund der vom Bundesminister für Wirtschaft und Arbeit verliehenen Befugnis auf ingenieur- oder naturwissenschaftlichen Fachgebieten tätig sind. Die Website provides a directory and information about civil engineers and architects in Austria, including contact details for regional chambers and the federal chamber.
Key services
Directory of certified civil engineers and architects, Information on professional regulations and certifications, Contact points for regional chambers, Member services and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 13, Google Maps API, Font Awesome 6
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to civil engineering and architecture professionals in Austria.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, though privacy policy is present.
  4. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected in the HTML content.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Maps API.
  6. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 13, indicating a modern single-page application framework. It integrates Google Maps API for geolocation features and uses Font Awesome 6 for iconography. The site loads multiple CSS and JS bundles, suggesting modular design. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could be optimized further. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta viewport and title tags but lacks advanced metadata like Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not explicitly available from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ziviltechniker.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ziviltechniker.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.