Skip to main content

Security report for zivefirmy.cz

Databox s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Živéfirmy.cz is a prominent independent online business directory focused on Czech companies, operated by Databox s.r.o. The platform offers comprehensive listings across multiple sectors including real estate, hospitality, retail, finance, education, and government. It targets marketing professionals, sales representatives, students, and the general public seeking reliable company data. The business model centers on free listings supplemented by premium promotion packages and value-added services such as insolvency monitoring. The website enjoys a strong market position as one of the largest Czech business catalogs with over 375,000 companies listed. Technically, the site employs a modern web stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced and cookie consent mechanisms are robust, though HTTP security headers and formal security policies are absent. Login functionality supports OAuth providers and secure form inputs. The security posture is solid but could be improved by adding security headers, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, and performing regular audits of third-party scripts. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the website content and business presence indicate legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR and cookie regulations. Strategically, Živéfirmy.cz should focus on enhancing transparency around security policies and domain registration details to strengthen trust. Technical modernization and accessibility improvements would further improve user experience and security resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zivefirmy.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zivefirmy.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
199
Employees
0
Customers
199
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for zivefirmy.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Živéfirmy.cz operates as a key player in the Czech online business directory market, leveraging a broad sector coverage and a large database of companies. Its competitive advantage lies in its independence, comprehensive data verification, and value-added services like insolvency alerts. The business model combines free access with premium paid services for enhanced visibility, targeting businesses seeking marketing exposure. The platform appeals to diverse customer segments including marketing professionals, government entities, educational institutions, and general users. Growth indicators include active weekly updates with new and removed companies and a steady user base. The partnership with Databox s.r.o. provides a solid corporate foundation. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in expanding digital marketing services and enhancing data analytics offerings to clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, secure login options including OAuth, and comprehensive cookie consent management aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No explicit security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices appear sound with no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Databox s.r.o.
Description
Živé firmy v České republice - a large independent catalog of Czech companies providing updated business information across multiple sectors.
Key services
Company listings, Premium company promotion packages, Insolvency monitoring service, Company data verification, User accounts with favorites and history
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 3.3.1, FontAwesome, Select2, Google Fonts (Rajdhani), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Secure login forms with OAuth options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  4. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with clear user consent mechanisms.
  5. Multiple business sectors covered with extensive company listings.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Secure login with OAuth providers and email/password form.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Contact information clearly provided with phone and email.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable and widely used technology stack featuring Bootstrap 3.3.7 for responsive design, jQuery 3.3.1 for DOM manipulation, and FontAwesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography, and analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive layouts and touch-friendly controls. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the site uses an older Bootstrap version and jQuery version, which may pose maintenance and security challenges. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zivefirmy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zivefirmy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.