Skip to main content

Security report for zirgs.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.zirgs.lv is a minimal portal built using the Softr platform, integrating Airtable as a backend data source. The site features basic navigation with a single image and lacks substantive business content or contact information. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance concern. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy assessment, though the site appears legitimate based on content and technology use. Overall, the site scores moderately on AI evaluation, with recommendations to improve privacy compliance, security headers, and business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zirgs.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business intelligence is limited due to minimal content and lack of explicit business information. The site appears to be a small-scale portal or internal tool rather than a commercial business front. There is no clear market positioning, revenue model, or target audience identified. The use of Softr and Airtable suggests a focus on ease of data management and portal creation, possibly for internal or niche user groups. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The lack of contact details and policies limits trust and credibility from a business perspective.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS and includes anonymized Google Analytics tracking, which is positive. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No forms or input fields are present to assess input validation or secure data handling. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the security posture requires enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency to meet best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information and incident response contacts to improve business credibility and security readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and tracking scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS data or using verified domain registration to improve trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Made with Softr, the easiest way to turn your data into portals and internal tools.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Font Awesome 6.5.0, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, MicroModal, Airtable Integration, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Softr
Platforms
Softr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built using Softr platform with Airtable backend integration.
  2. Content is minimal and mostly placeholder with a single image and basic navigation.
  3. No contact information, privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage.
  5. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts are present.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  9. Website is mobile responsive and uses modern JavaScript libraries.
  10. Branding is consistent with Softr default styling.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Softr platform, utilizing Airtable as a backend data source. It employs modern front-end technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap 4.3.1, and Font Awesome 6.5.0. Analytics and marketing tools integrated include Google Analytics (with IP anonymization), Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate given the use of multiple external scripts. No CMS other than Softr is detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and accessibility enhancements. Technical debt appears low but the site is minimalistic and could benefit from richer content and improved technical SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zirgs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zirgs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.